Why Is a Viking Group in Manitoba Named After an Irish God?

Festival-goers raise hands beneath a Hiberno-Norse Heritage Festival sign

Well, this is what happens when you chase rabbits.

I was digging into Íslendingadagurinn, the Icelandic Festival of Manitoba held in Gimli, because it had wandered into another question I’ve been asking lately: what survives when a religion disappears but a culture keeps remembering? Íslendingadagurinn is not a Pagan festival. It is an Icelandic-Canadian cultural festival with roots going back to 1890, and yet within it we find sagas, Viking history, folklore, old imagery and a reconstructed Viking Village. Then, buried rather innocently on the official Viking Village page, I noticed the name of the living-history group helping make that village happen.

Hands of Lugh.

Hang on.

Lugh?

Not Odin. Not Thor. Not Freyr. Not Tyr.

Lugh.

One of the great figures of the old Irish mythological tradition.

So why, in the middle of an Icelandic festival in Gimli, Manitoba, is a Viking living-history organization carrying the name of an Irish god?

At first glance it looks like one of those wonderful historical mismatches that modern Paganism produces from time to time: Celtic thing over here, Norse thing over there, someone likes both, mash them together and carry on. Except the deeper I went, the less mismatched it became. In fact, the problem may not be Hands of Lugh at all.

The problem may be the filing cabinets we use to organize history.

First, Who Are Hands of Lugh?

Hands of Lugh describes itself quite simply as “Viking Age Living History.” This isn’t just a bunch of people putting on horned helmets and beating on shields for tourists. In fact, their own authenticity guidelines specifically prohibit horned helmets, along with a number of other things that belong more to modern Viking fantasy than the archaeological record.

The group reconstructs aspects of Viking Age life through clothing, cooking, textiles, metalworking, woodworking, archery, slings, combat and other everyday skills. Their material is researched, recreated and then actually used within a living-history setting. At Íslendingadagurinn, the Icelandic Festival’s own Viking Village page says its reenactors have spent thousands of hours researching and recreating objects from the period. Hands of Lugh is named directly as a partner in that village.

And this isn’t their only appearance. Hands of Lugh also turns up at Manitoba heritage events, Highland gatherings, medieval festivals and the Gimli Ice Festival. An older Manitoba Highland Gathering page identifies the group as “formerly called Sons of Lugh.” So the name isn’t some recent branding choice created specifically for Íslendingadagurinn. Lugh has apparently been along for the ride for quite some time.

That older name gives us another little breadcrumb. Search around the group’s older presence online and you will find references to the Sons of Lugh associated with Hiberno-Norse or Norse-Gaelic reenactment. But we don’t even have to depend entirely on old social-media descriptions to make the Irish connection, because the current Hands of Lugh authenticity guide tells us exactly what historical world they are interested in reconstructing.

And this is where the rabbit gets interesting.

Look at Their Map, Not Just Their Name

The Hands of Lugh Authenticity Guide says that a core objective of the Viking Village is an accurate portrayal of the later Viking Age with a particular focus on Iceland. Fair enough. We are standing in New Iceland, at an Icelandic festival. You would expect Iceland.

But then they explain where they look for material evidence.

The guide says objects should generally reflect Viking Age northwestern Europe, particularly the western diaspora, and actually gives examples: Hedeby, York and Dublin. Their preferred period is roughly 950–1000 CE. Icelandic archaeological material is considered ideal, but because surviving Icelandic finds can be fragmentary, they draw carefully from related places within that western Viking world.

There it is.

Dublin.

Suddenly the Irish name on the Viking group isn’t sitting quite so awkwardly anymore.

Because the Viking Age was not a neat little Scandinavian box.

The Vikings Went to Ireland — And Then Ireland Happened to Them

The first recorded Viking raids on Ireland occurred near the end of the eighth century. Raiding eventually became settlement. Dublin became a fortified Viking base in the ninth century, while Dublin, Waterford, Limerick, Cork and Wexford developed into major centres of Viking settlement and trade. According to the National Museum of Ireland, these settlements helped create Ireland’s first towns and profoundly altered Irish economic and cultural life.

But cultures have a bad habit of refusing to remain separate once human beings actually start living beside one another.

Norse settlers traded with Irish people. They fought Irish people. Irish kings allied with Norse rulers. Norse rulers allied with Irish kings. People married. Children were born. Languages rubbed against each other. Clothing, jewellery, technology, art and stories crossed boundaries. Eventually there were people who could no longer be described particularly well by saying simply “Irish” or “Norse.”

They are commonly called Hiberno-Norse or Norse-Gaels.

Heritage Ireland describes the Hiberno-Norse as emerging from Irish-Norse relationships and mixed communities beginning during the Viking Age. These were people growing up inside cultural households that could contain both Irish and Norse influences. The National Museum goes even further into the archaeological problem: by the end of the tenth century, as Viking communities in Ireland adopted Christianity and the cultures increasingly fused, it can sometimes become difficult to tell whether an object should even be classified as Viking or Irish.

Think about that for a moment.

We like our labels.

Celtic.

Norse.

Irish.

Icelandic.

Viking.

Heathen.

Separate shelves. Separate books. Separate pantheons. Separate symbols.

The archaeological record basically shrugs at us and says, “Good luck with that.”

And then Hands of Lugh walks into an Icelandic festival carrying the name of an Irish god and accidentally demonstrates the entire problem.

But Why Lugh?

This is where I want to be careful.

I have not found a statement from Hands of Lugh saying, “We chose this name for the following religious or historical reason.” Unless somebody from the organization tells us directly, anything more specific than the evidence allows becomes speculation.

But the choice is certainly interesting.

Lugh — Lug in older Irish material — appears prominently in Cath Maige Tuired, the Second Battle of Mag Tuired, one of the major surviving texts dealing with the Túatha Dé Danann. The University College Cork Corpus of Electronic Texts provides Elizabeth A. Gray’s translation of the story.

In one of Lugh’s most famous scenes, he arrives at Tara and is stopped by the doorkeeper. He needs to demonstrate that he has something to offer the court.

So Lugh starts listing skills.

Builder.

Smith.

Champion.

Harper.

Warrior.

Poet and historian.

Sorcerer.

Physician.

Cupbearer.

Brazier.

Each time the doorkeeper essentially tells him, “We’ve already got one of those.”

Finally Lugh asks the question that changes everything: do you have one person who possesses all of these arts?

They don’t.

He is admitted.

The text calls him Samildánach, the one skilled in many arts. His importance isn’t that he alone knows how to swing a weapon. It is precisely the opposite. Lugh embodies breadth of skill. Craftsmanship, knowledge, music, medicine, martial ability, leadership and practical competence all exist in the same figure.

Now go back and look at Hands of Lugh.

Metalworking.

Woodworking.

Textiles.

Cooking.

Archery.

Combat.

Historical research.

Reconstruction.

A group of people attempting to recover and demonstrate the many skills required to recreate a functioning slice of Viking Age life.

Does that prove they chose Lugh because he was Samildánach?

No.

But if you were going to choose an Irish mythological figure as the namesake of a hands-on historical-reconstruction group built around mastering many different crafts, you could certainly do worse.

And the later change from Sons of Lugh to Hands of Lugh makes the imagery even better, whether intentionally or accidentally.

These are quite literally the hands doing the work.

The Icelandic Connection Is More Celtic Than We Sometimes Remember

There is another reason we should be careful about imagining Icelandic history as exclusively Scandinavian.

The settlement of Iceland itself involved people from both the Scandinavian world and the British Isles. Modern genetic research has confirmed what historical and genealogical scholarship had long suggested: the founding population of Iceland contained substantial Norse and Gaelic ancestry.

A major ancient-DNA study published in Science examined genomes from Iceland’s early population and found that the founders had both Gaelic and Norse origins. That does not mean “Iceland was secretly Celtic,” any more than finding Norse ancestry in Ireland means “Ireland was secretly Scandinavian.” It means the actual North Atlantic world was connected.

People moved.

And they carried other people with them, sometimes voluntarily and sometimes very much not. We should not romanticize that process. Viking expansion included slavery, captive-taking and violence. Some of the Gaelic presence in Iceland almost certainly came through people taken from Ireland and Britain into Norse-controlled networks. Other movement occurred through marriage, settlement, alliance and migration.

The result, however, was that when Iceland emerged as a distinct society, its human roots did not come solely from Scandinavia.

So when an Iceland-focused historical group looks westward toward Dublin and the Norse-Gaelic world for comparative archaeological material, it isn’t wandering off topic.

It’s following the roads the Vikings themselves travelled.

Maybe “Celtic Versus Norse” Was Always the Wrong Question

This is where I think modern Paganism can learn something from the reenactors.

We have become very good at taxonomy.

This deity belongs to this pantheon. This symbol belongs to that culture. This practice came from these people. This reconstruction belongs on this shelf. Heathenry goes here. Celtic Paganism goes there. Druidry goes over there. Don’t mix the folders.

There are good reasons for some of that. Historical specificity matters. Cultural appropriation matters. Claiming that every European tradition was secretly one universal religion does violence to the differences between those cultures. We shouldn’t erase distinctions merely because it makes our modern spiritual lives tidier.

But going too far in the opposite direction creates another fiction.

People in the past were not museum exhibits.

The Irish Sea was not a wall.

The North Atlantic was not divided by modern national borders.

A ship leaving Norway could touch Scotland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, Iceland and beyond. Dublin was part of a Viking trade network reaching far beyond Ireland. York was another enormous cultural crossroads. Iceland’s settlers carried Scandinavian and Gaelic ancestry. Norse-Gaelic societies emerged precisely because people didn’t remain conveniently inside the categories we later invented for them.

So perhaps the question isn’t:

“Why is there an Irish god in a Viking group?”

Perhaps the better question is:

“Why did we assume the Irish and Viking worlds were separate enough that this should surprise us?”

That’s a much better rabbit.

Then There Is the Question of Religion

There is another distinction worth making because this is Unplugged Pagan and sooner or later somebody is going to ask it.

Does calling the organization Hands of Lugh make it a Pagan group?

Not from anything I can find.

The organization’s public material presents Hands of Lugh as a Viking Age living-history organization. Its website concentrates on historical accuracy, material culture, crafts, combat and education. I have found no statement requiring members to worship Lugh, practice Irish Paganism, follow Heathenry or hold any particular religious belief.

In fact, the group has published a statement called Vikings Against Racism, explicitly rejecting discrimination based on race, religion or gender and pushing back against the racist appropriation of Viking imagery.

That matters.

Because again we encounter this strange territory between religion, history and cultural memory.

Here is the name of an old Irish divine figure being carried by a modern Canadian organization that does not appear to require religious devotion to him.

Lugh’s name survives.

The crafts survive — or are reconstructed.

The stories survive because manuscripts survived.

The Viking material survives because archaeologists dug it out of the ground.

The Hiberno-Norse world survives because historians, museums and researchers piece together the evidence.

Then living historians pick all of this material up with their hands and make it tangible again.

There is something wonderfully appropriate about that.

Reconstruction Is Memory Done Deliberately

This brings us straight back to the rabbit that started this whole thing.

I’ve been asking what happens when communities disappear and what survives when nobody deliberately records their history. Íslendingadagurinn gave us one answer: cultural memory can survive for generations when people continue gathering, telling stories and building institutions around that memory.

Hands of Lugh gives us another.

Sometimes memory isn’t enough.

Sometimes you have to reconstruct.

You find the object.

You read the excavation report.

You compare several finds.

You work out how the thing might have been made.

You discover your first attempt doesn’t work.

You make it again.

You wear the clothing instead of merely looking at it behind glass. You cook with the utensils. You work the metal. You split the wood. You spin the fibre. You carry the shield. You discover which historical assumptions survive contact with actual human hands.

That’s a different form of remembering.

It is remembering through doing.

And there may be something here for modern Paganism that goes beyond Vikings, Ireland or Iceland.

We’ve become very good at preserving information.

Books.

Websites.

PDF files.

Archives.

Photographs.

Posts like this one.

But culture is not information alone.

Some things have to be done.

A song that nobody sings is preserved, but it isn’t quite alive.

A ritual nobody performs can remain perfectly documented and still be dead.

A craft described in a book survives intellectually, but something changes when somebody puts tool to material and discovers what the written description left out.

A story can sit safely inside an archive for a thousand years, but it becomes something different when human beings gather and tell it again.

Hands matter.

Perhaps that’s why I keep coming back to the name.

The Hands of Lugh

I don’t know exactly why the founders chose it.

Maybe someone from the organization will eventually tell me and this entire rabbit will acquire another tunnel.

But knowing what we now know, the name no longer looks strange.

A living-history group reconstructing the western Viking diaspora, including material connected with Dublin and the Hiberno-Norse world, carries the name of an Irish mythological figure famous for possessing many skills. That group then helps build a Viking Village at an Icelandic-Canadian festival in a community created by descendants of Icelandic immigrants, themselves heirs to an Icelandic population whose founding ancestry included both Norse and Gaelic people.

That isn’t a historical contradiction.

That’s the North Atlantic world.

Messy.

Connected.

Borrowing.

Trading.

Fighting.

Marrying.

Migrating.

Remembering.

Forgetting.

And reconstructing.

Maybe our modern categories are useful maps, but we should stop mistaking the map for the landscape.

Because somewhere in Manitoba, at an Icelandic festival, a group named for an Irish god is reconstructing Viking Age life using evidence from Iceland, Scandinavia, York, Dublin and the wider western Viking diaspora.

And somehow, after following the rabbit far enough, that stops looking strange altogether.

In fact, it starts looking remarkably appropriate.

Maybe Lugh wasn’t lost in the wrong pantheon.

Maybe we were the ones who put up walls where history never had them.

Sources and Further Reading

What Remains When the Gods Are Gone?

Crowd at Íslendingadagurinn Icelandic Heritage Festival beside waterfront stage and Viking ship

Íslendingadagurinn and the Survival of Cultural Memory

I’ve been chasing this particular rabbit for a while now without really knowing where it was going. We’ve been talking about Pagan history, about memory, about second-generation Pagans, third-generation Pagans, communities disappearing, traditions changing and the uncomfortable question of what actually survives when the people who built something are no longer there to explain it. Then I stumbled across Íslendingadagurinn, the Icelandic Festival of Manitoba, and suddenly there was another version of the question sitting right in front of me.

Íslendingadagurinn means, roughly, “Day of the Icelanders.” It began in Winnipeg in 1890 and eventually moved permanently to Gimli, Manitoba, in 1932. Gimli itself sits inside what was historically known as New Iceland, one of the major Icelandic settlement areas in Canada. Icelandic immigrants began arriving there in significant numbers during the nineteenth century, bringing with them language, stories, customs, identity and, like most Icelanders of that period, Christianity. That last bit matters, because Íslendingadagurinn is not a Pagan festival. It was not created as a Heathen gathering. It is not some uninterrupted survival of pre-Christian Norse religion hiding on the shores of Lake Winnipeg.

And that is precisely why I find it so interesting.

Because more than a century later, look at what remains.

There is a Viking Village. There are demonstrations of Norse crafts and daily life. There are discussions of the Alþingi, settlement, law, trade and the sagas. Icelandic folklore remains visible. Trolls and elves haven’t entirely disappeared from the cultural landscape. Norse imagery remains recognizable. The festival still celebrates the history of the Icelandic people who came to Canada and built a community there, and generations of descendants have continued participating in that celebration long after the original immigrants were gone.

Then there is the Fjallkona, the “Lady of the Mountain,” a symbolic personification of Iceland. Íslendingadagurinn has selected a Fjallkona since 1924. She represents Iceland itself, with Icelanders poetically understood as her children. The symbolism surrounding the figure reaches into older Icelandic imagery involving mountains, ravens, runes and the landscape of Iceland itself. Again, this does not make the ceremony Pagan. Symbols have a strange habit of surviving religions, governments and centuries. Sometimes we remember where they came from. Sometimes we don’t.

And that’s where this rabbit turned around and looked at me.

We’ve been asking what happens when Pagan communities disappear. What survives when the gatherings end, the organizations collapse, the elders die, the newsletters stop being printed and nobody remembers who started what or why something was done a certain way. We tend to think that if the religion survives, the tradition survives. Íslendingadagurinn presents us with almost the opposite experiment.

What happens when the old religion disappears, but the culture keeps remembering?

Apparently, quite a bit survives.

The sagas survive. The ancestral stories survive. Names survive. Food survives. Music survives. Folklore survives. Symbols survive. Historical memory survives. Even pieces of the worldview that produced the old religion can survive, though the people carrying them may no longer understand those things as religious at all.

There is an important distinction here, because I don’t want to commit the same mistake modern Paganism sometimes makes when looking backward. Cultural survival is not the same thing as religious survival. A Viking reenactor is not automatically Heathen. Someone celebrating Icelandic ancestry is not secretly worshipping Odin. A raven on a banner does not turn a cultural festival into a blót. We do ourselves no favours by claiming everything remotely Norse as evidence that the old religion somehow survived intact.

It didn’t.

But perhaps the more interesting question is whether anything ever survives intact.

Maybe religions don’t survive as sealed boxes handed from one generation to the next. Maybe they dissolve into stories, customs, sayings, festivals, family habits, art, language and identity. Some pieces disappear completely. Others get renamed. Some become folklore. Some become children’s stories. Some become cultural symbols. Then, generations later, somebody goes digging through the attic of history and discovers that the supposedly decorative object on the shelf once meant something entirely different.

Modern Paganism has done a great deal of that digging.

Heathenry, Ásatrú, modern Druidry and many other reconstructed or revived traditions exist partly because people deliberately went looking for fragments. Archaeology. Folklore. Sagas. Place names. Medieval manuscripts. Legal codes. Folk customs. Songs. Archaeological remains. The writings of people who were often documenting traditions after conversion had already taken place. We reconstruct because continuity was broken.

But Gimli suggests that broken continuity does not necessarily mean cultural amnesia.

There is another piece of this that interests me even more. Íslendingadagurinn has been carried forward through generations. Children attended with parents. Grandchildren attended with grandparents. Volunteers followed relatives into the organization. People grew up knowing that this thing existed because their family and community kept showing up to do it.

That should sound familiar to anyone who has been following my recent rabbits.

I’ve been wondering where the third-generation Pagans are. I’ve met second-generation Pagans. I’ve met people who grew up at gatherings and festivals and now describe Paganism as “that weird thing my parents did.” Some still attend gatherings because those places are part of their childhood landscape even when the religion itself no longer means quite the same thing to them. Some now have children of their own. Somewhere out there, third-generation Paganism is beginning whether we have noticed it or not.

But what exactly are we handing them?

That may be the lesson hiding inside Íslendingadagurinn.

The Icelandic Canadians of Manitoba did not preserve their identity by writing a manifesto saying Icelandic culture must survive. They preserved it by continuing to do things. They gathered. They told stories. They celebrated. They remembered names. They created institutions. They taught children what the symbols meant. They created something worth returning to, even for descendants whose relationship with Iceland itself became increasingly distant with every generation.

Modern Paganism has spent an enormous amount of energy arguing about belief, legitimacy, labels, lineage and who is Pagan enough to call themselves Pagan. Those conversations sometimes matter. But perhaps we have underestimated the much more mundane machinery of cultural survival.

Who cooks the food?

Who keeps the photographs?

Who tells the story about the year the tent blew away?

Who remembers why the procession goes left instead of right?

Who keeps the old newsletters?

Who teaches the songs?

Who brings their children back?

Who writes down the names of the people in the photograph before everyone who recognizes them is dead?

That is how culture survives.

And perhaps this connects directly to another rabbit we’ve been chasing: maybe Paganism isn’t supposed to survive intact.

That sentence sounds almost heretical when you first say it. Surely preservation is the goal. Surely we want future Pagans to know exactly what we believed, exactly what we practiced and exactly why we did it. But that’s not really how living cultures work. Every generation forgets something. Every generation adds something. Every generation throws away practices that no longer make sense and accidentally preserves things nobody expected to matter.

The Icelandic settlers who arrived in Manitoba could not possibly have known what their descendants would still care about a century and a half later. They couldn’t have predicted Viking reenactors, tourism, heritage parks or modern Canadians rediscovering Icelandic ancestry through genealogy and the internet. They simply created communities and traditions strong enough that later generations had something to inherit.

Maybe that should change the question we ask about Paganism.

Instead of asking, “How do we make sure Paganism survives exactly as we practice it?” perhaps we should ask, “What are we creating that someone will still find worth remembering a hundred years from now?”

That is a much harder question.

Organizations disappear. Festivals end. Websites vanish. Leaders fall out of favour. Communities fracture. The Paganism somebody encounters fifty years from now may barely resemble the Paganism we recognize today.

But perhaps somebody will still light a fire.

Perhaps someone will still tell the stories.

Perhaps a child who spent summers running around a Pagan gathering will bring their own grandchildren back to the same piece of land and say, “This is something our family used to do.”

They may understand it differently.

They may call it something different.

They may even forget why we thought it mattered.

But something will have survived.

Íslendingadagurinn has been doing exactly that for more than a century. Not preserving an ancient Norse religion, but carrying Icelandic cultural memory across generations on Canadian soil.

And maybe the rabbit hiding underneath all of this is surprisingly simple.

Religion can disappear while culture remembers.

Which leaves those of us creating Pagan culture today with a rather uncomfortable question.

What are we doing that is worth remembering?

And if nobody writes any of it down, how will they know?

Closing the Rabbit Hole

Overlapping festival community network web visualization

What This Investigation Actually Taught Me

I really did not intend to go this far down the rabbit hole.

What started as a fairly simple question about overlapping people and festivals turned into several posts, a timeline, a network map, a reverse search, a festival matrix and eventually something resembling a small Organizational Behaviour case study.

And, strangely enough, I am glad it did.

Because the deeper we went, the less simple the story became.

The Original Question Was Too Simple

At the beginning, it would have been easy to imagine a straight line:

Rainbow
   |
 Eric Mandala
   |
Bhakti
   |
Raven's Knoll
   |
KN¿WHERE

That would have made for a very tidy story.

It also would have been wrong.

The evidence did not reveal one person connecting everything.

It did not reveal one organization directing everything.

And it certainly did not reveal some hidden command structure linking all these communities together.

What appeared instead was considerably more ordinary and considerably more interesting.

A network.

Actually, Several Networks

We found a long-running devotional music, yoga and wellness community operating through Ottawa, Gatineau, Peterborough and surrounding areas.

We found people moving repeatedly through Bhakti in the Woods, Bhakti Bliss, Gaiafest, Peterborough Yoga Festival, Rooted in Wellness and other events.

We found another network extending through Pagan gatherings, Rainbow-associated environments, ecstatic dance and transformational festivals.

We found another through Ottawa electronic music, psychedelic events, Eclipse Festival and Sonic Springs.

And we found KN¿WHERE developing largely from its own Toronto bass-music and DNR Productions lineage before parts of that network began touching some of the same broader festival ecosystem.

The People Were Important, But Not in the Way I Expected

Eric Mandala remains an important person in the map.

He crosses between cultural environments more often than most of the people we examined.

But he turned out not to be the bridge.

Remove Eric and the network still exists.

Rebecca White Raven still connects the Bhakti in the Woods lineage with Bhakti Bliss.

Justine Hoang still appears repeatedly through the regional yoga and kirtan environment.

Kevin Guerette remains part of that devotional music community.

Andrew Sass remains embedded in the Bhakti and Gaiafest cluster.

Nikoli independently connects Gaiafest, Eclipse and Ottawa electronic culture.

Other people we had not originally been looking at produced additional links once we reversed the search.

That was probably one of the most important lessons.

If a network disappears when you remove one person, you may be looking at one person’s social circle. If it continues to function through several independent paths, you are probably looking at an actual social ecosystem.

The Festivals Were Important Too

Some events turned out to play very different roles.

Bhakti Bliss appears to concentrate a large portion of the recurring devotional, yoga and wellness community.

Gaiafest appears particularly important because people from somewhat different cultural environments meet there.

Eclipse Festival appears to act as another bridge into psychedelic and transformational electronic culture.

Raven’s Knoll performs a different function again. It is a physical venue where events from very different organizational histories can occupy the same space.

And KN¿WHERE, despite becoming part of this larger map, still appears to possess its own organizational ancestry through DNR and Toronto electronic music rather than simply emerging from the Bhakti or Rainbow communities.

That Difference Matters

It would have been very easy to confuse connection with control.

That is probably the biggest caution I am taking away from this entire exercise.

Two people appearing at the same festival does not establish partnership.

A performer appearing at an event does not make that performer an organizer.

Two festivals using the same venue do not become the same organization.

A person participating in several communities does not mean those communities answer to one another.

And a network can be completely real without being conspiratorial.

Organizational Behaviour Made This Much Easier to Understand

This is where my Organizational Behaviour studies unexpectedly became useful.

Once I stopped thinking only in terms of organizations and started thinking in terms of informal organizations, the entire picture made more sense.

Organizational charts tell us who officially reports to whom.

Networks tell us who actually interacts.

People recommend people.

Performers introduce performers.

Volunteers become organizers.

Organizers reuse people they trust.

Ideas travel with the people carrying them.

Culture moves from one environment into another.

Some people become what Organizational Behaviour calls boundary spanners: people capable of moving between otherwise different communities.

Some festivals become brokerage points: places where those communities meet.

And some venues become physical nodes through which otherwise unrelated groups encounter the same space.

The Network Was More Resilient Than I Expected

Another OB concept became visible as the research expanded: redundancy.

The network has multiple pathways.

Remove one connection and others remain.

Remove one festival and people still meet through another.

Remove one individual and the community continues functioning through other relationships.

That is exactly what makes informal social networks durable.

The Rabbit Hole Also Demonstrated Confirmation Bias

There was another lesson here that had nothing to do with festivals.

It concerned the investigation itself.

Once you find a possible pattern, it is extremely easy to start looking only for things that confirm it.

That is why reversing the search became so important.

Instead of repeatedly starting with Eric, Bhakti or Raven’s Knoll and searching outward, we started from KN¿WHERE and worked backward.

Then we started from Gaiafest.

Then from other performers.

Then from other workshops and festival lineups.

Some apparent connections survived.

Some became stronger.

Some disappeared entirely.

The Andrew question is a perfect example.

Once better identification became available, the responsible conclusion was not to force two Andrews into the same person.

It was to say:

That connection is not established.

Likewise, when a search result appeared to connect another performer directly with KN¿WHERE but the underlying source did not support it, the connection had to be removed.

That is not a failure of an investigation.

That is what investigation is supposed to look like.

Sometimes the Negative Result Is the Result

We did not find evidence showing that Rainbow Family controls Bhakti Bliss.

We did not find evidence showing that Bhakti Bliss operates KN¿WHERE.

We did not find evidence showing that Eric Mandala organizes KN¿WHERE.

We did not find evidence showing that the principal Bhakti organizers operate KN¿WHERE.

Those are useful findings.

Because eliminating explanations is part of understanding what remains.

So What Did We Actually Find?

If I had to reduce several posts of investigation into one conclusion, it would be this:

There appears to be a broad and overlapping regional festival ecosystem involving devotional music, yoga, wellness, Pagan and Rainbow-associated circles, electronic music, psytrance, transformational festivals and professional festival production. Different individuals move between different portions of that ecosystem, while events such as Gaiafest and Eclipse and venues such as Raven’s Knoll create points where otherwise separate networks become adjacent.

That is a much more defensible conclusion than saying everyone belongs to the same organization.

And I think it is actually more interesting.

Because This Is How Communities Really Work

People rarely live inside one neatly labelled box.

The yoga teacher may also attend an electronic festival.

The electronic musician may teach meditation.

The Pagan musician may perform kirtan.

The festival organizer may know people from three other festivals.

The person volunteering this year may organize something next year.

A campground may begin with one community and eventually host several.

None of that requires a grand plan.

It requires people.

And time.

That May Be the Most Educational Part

I originally went into this trying to understand a few connections.

I came out of it with a much better practical understanding of:

  • informal organizations;
  • organizational culture;
  • boundary spanning;
  • social-network analysis;
  • communities of practice;
  • organizational continuity;
  • brokerage;
  • network redundancy;
  • confirmation bias;
  • and the difference between correlation, connection and control.

That is considerably more than I expected when I started.

And I Think This Is Where I Get Off the Ride

Could the network be mapped farther?

Absolutely.

There are hundreds more performers, facilitators, organizers, volunteers and festivals that could theoretically be followed.

At some point, however, the additional detail stops changing the conclusion.

We have already established that the network is broader than one person.

We have established that several independent communities overlap.

We have identified some of the important bridges.

We have also identified where the evidence stops.

Going another fifty names deeper might make the map larger.

I am no longer convinced it would make the conclusion substantially better.

And knowing when to stop is part of research too.

Final Thought

I did not intend to go this far down the rabbit hole.

But it was educational.

What began as an investigation into festivals became, unexpectedly, a lesson in how communities form and how people carry culture between them.

The final answer was not a hidden organization.

It was something much more human.

Relationships.

People meet.

People collaborate.

People introduce one another.

Communities overlap.

Culture travels.

And eventually a network emerges.

Sometimes there really is a rabbit hole.

Sometimes, when you finally reach the bottom, you discover that what looked mysterious from above is simply a very complicated collection of people knowing other people.

And perhaps that is a good place to leave this one.

Reverse the Search

Overlapping festival networks with central connecting nodes

What Happens When We Follow Everyone Instead?

There is a problem that can creep into any investigation like this.

You find one interesting person.

You follow their connections.

You find another person.

You follow those connections.

Before long, you can accidentally create a network that exists partly because you chose where to start looking.

So I decided to change the method.

Instead of starting with Eric Mandala, Rebecca White Raven, Bhakti Bliss or KN¿WHERE, I began reversing the search across the entire collection of festivals and communities we have been examining.

Take the organizers.

Take the workshop facilitators.

Take the yoga instructors.

Take the musicians.

Take the wellness presenters.

Take the recurring non-DJ performers.

Then ask where else those people appear.

The result changes the picture considerably.

We are no longer looking at one chain of connections. We are beginning to see several overlapping festival circuits.

A Necessary Correction First

One apparent connection surfaced during the search involving electronic artist Etienne Ozborne and KN¿WHERE.

On closer examination, I could not substantiate that connection from the underlying festival material.

So I am withdrawing it.

Etienne remains relevant because his documented festival history intersects with Gaiafest, Eclipse and Sonic Springs, but I am not counting him as a confirmed KN¿WHERE crossover.

This is worth mentioning because this is exactly how network research should work.

If a connection does not survive verification, remove it.

A cleaner map is more useful than a larger one.

Rebecca White Raven: Organizational Continuity

Rebecca remains one of the clearest people in the network, but for a different reason than Eric Mandala.

Rebecca helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and later initiated Bhakti Bliss following the end of Bhakti in the Woods’ approximately ten-year run.

That creates one of the strongest organizational continuities we have found:

BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
        |
 Rebecca White Raven
        |
        v
   BHAKTI BLISS

But reversing outward from Rebecca also takes us into Gaiafest.

She has appeared there through sound healing and related programming.

So Rebecca is not simply the connection between an old festival and its successor.

She also moves through a broader regional wellness and spiritual festival environment.

Kevin Guerette: The Devotional Music Network

Kevin Guerette appears repeatedly with Rebecca within kirtan and devotional music communities.

His appearances help show that this is not simply a story about individual yoga teachers working independently.

There is a recognizable Ottawa–Gatineau devotional music circuit.

Kevin and Rebecca have appeared around Bhakti-related events, Gaiafest and other regional yoga and wellness environments.

That gives us another persistent relationship:

Ottawa / Gatineau
kirtan community
       |
 Rebecca + Kevin
       |
       +---- Bhakti network
       |
       +---- Gaiafest
       |
       +---- regional wellness events

Justine Hoang: Another Long-Running Regional Bridge

Justine Hoang appears across several different parts of the same regional environment.

Her public festival history includes yoga, kirtan, Bhakti programming and wellness events.

She appears around:

  • Bhakti in the Woods;
  • Bhakti Bliss;
  • Gaiafest;
  • Peterborough Yoga Festival;
  • City of Om;
  • 24Hr Yogapalooza;
  • and Rooted in Wellness.

That makes her particularly useful from an Organizational Behaviour perspective.

She is not necessarily an organizational leader across all of these events.

Instead, she represents something equally important:

a recurring participant within a community of practice.

People like this carry relationships, knowledge, expectations and culture between events.

Andrew Sass: The Pattern Repeats

Andrew Sass also appears repeatedly within the Bhakti and regional wellness environment.

His connections include the OMBuds, Bhakti-related programming, Gaiafest and Bhakti Bliss.

Bhakti in the Woods
        |
    Andrew Sass
       /    \
      /      \
   OMBuds   Gaiafest
      \
       \
    Bhakti Bliss

The important point is not that Andrew controls any of those environments.

It is that his repeated presence helps demonstrate that we are looking at an actual recurring social community rather than random one-time festival bookings.

Gaiafest Changes Everything

The more people we reverse-search, the more important Gaiafest becomes.

Originally I treated Gaiafest as another festival where Eric Mandala appeared.

That interpretation is no longer adequate.

Gaiafest has also included:

  • Rebecca White Raven;
  • Kevin Guerette;
  • Justine Hoang;
  • Andrew Sass;
  • Christine Lamothe;
  • and people from the electronic and transformational festival environment.

So Gaiafest looks less like an Eric Mandala satellite and more like an independent convergence point.

                 GAIAFEST
        ___________|___________
       /      /     |     \    \
    Eric  Rebecca Justine Andrew others
             |
           Kevin

That is significant.

The festival appears capable of attracting people from devotional music, yoga, wellness, ecstatic dance and electronic festival communities.

Christine Lamothe: A Connection We Had Not Been Following

Christine Lamothe is a good example of why reversing the search matters.

She was not one of the original people at the centre of our investigation.

Yet public festival material places her at Gaiafest, while Bhakti Bliss also lists her within workshop programming.

That creates another completely independent bridge:

GAIAFEST
    |
Christine Lamothe
    |
BHAKTI BLISS

This matters because the Gaiafest–Bhakti Bliss overlap no longer depends on Rebecca, Eric, Justine or Andrew.

The relationship survives when we start looking at other people.

That is stronger evidence of network overlap.

Tiina Kivinen: Peterborough Enters the Network

Tiina Kivinen provides another independent route.

Her public history connects the Peterborough yoga and kirtan community with Bhakti Bliss.

PETERBOROUGH YOGA /
KIRTAN COMMUNITY
       |
 Tiina Kivinen
       |
       v
 BHAKTI BLISS

Again, this makes the overall network less dependent on the people we originally chose to investigate.

The regional circuit extends beyond Ottawa and Gatineau.

Eric Mandala Still Occupies a Different Position

Eric remains important, but the expanded search helps us understand why.

Rebecca is particularly important for continuity within the Bhakti world.

Eric is particularly important because he crosses between environments that otherwise do not completely overlap.

His documented festival history extends through:

  • Rainbow-associated environments;
  • Pagan festival environments;
  • Bhakti Bliss;
  • Gaiafest;
  • Eclipse Festival;
  • and international transformational festival culture.

His position therefore looks more like this:

             Rainbow
                |
            Eric Mandala
          /      |       \
         /       |        \
      Pagan   Gaiafest   Eclipse
                 |
            Bhakti Bliss

That is a classic boundary-spanning position.

But Eric Is No Longer Necessary to Explain the Network

This may be one of the most important findings in the entire investigation.

If removing Eric caused the rest of the relationships to disappear, we could reasonably describe him as the principal bridge holding everything together.

That is not what happens.

Remove Eric and we still have:

Bhakti in the Woods
       |
    Rebecca
       |
 Bhakti Bliss
       |
    Gaiafest
   /    |    \
Justine Andrew Christine
       |
regional yoga /
wellness network

So Eric is an important bridge.

He is not the only bridge.

Nikoli Reveals Another Side of Gaiafest

Then the expanded search takes us somewhere different again.

Electronic artist and organizer Nikoli has been publicly associated with Gaiafest, Eclipse Festival, Sonic Springs and Ottawa’s Music.Art.Ppl collective.

That gives us an entirely separate pathway:

                ECLIPSE
                   |
                 NIKOLI
                /      \
        GAIAFEST      MUSIC.ART.PPL
                         |
                    Ottawa electronic
                         |
                    SONIC SPRINGS

This matters for a very specific reason.

We already had:

Gaiafest
   |
Eric Mandala
   |
Eclipse

Now we also have:

Gaiafest
   |
 Nikoli
   |
Eclipse

So Gaiafest’s connection to the broader electronic and transformational festival ecosystem does not depend solely on Eric either.

Sonic Springs Needs to Be Added to the Map

Sonic Springs emerged repeatedly as the reverse search expanded.

It presents itself as a music, arts and wellness festival combining electronic music, visual art, workshops, wellness activities, nature and community.

That combination should sound familiar by now.

It occupies almost exactly the cultural territory where several of our previously separate networks begin overlapping:

electronic music + art + wellness + camping + community.

Nikoli connects Sonic Springs to Gaiafest and Eclipse.

That makes Sonic Springs another useful node within the wider ecosystem.

Now Return to KN¿WHERE

Our previous reverse search of KN¿WHERE produced a different collection of people.

KN¿WHERE itself appears to have a strong independent origin in Toronto bass music and DNR Productions.

Nirvana Fernandez provides that organizational lineage.

Festival director Sig Greenebaum contributes professional festival-management experience from a different environment again.

Then KN¿WHERE’s workshop and wellness programming introduces still other networks.

The most important discovery there was Mikael Polo.

Mikael Polo: KN¿WHERE Reaches Back Into Psytrance

Public material surrounding Polo identifies previous involvement in Ontario psychedelic and psytrance event organization.

Promotional material also credits him with experience around Eclipse Festival Canada.

That gives us:

ECLIPSE
   |
Mikael Polo
   |
Ontario psytrance
   |
yoga / breathwork
   |
KN¿WHERE

This is significant because Eclipse was already appearing on the other side of our network.

Eric Mandala also reaches Eclipse.

Nikoli also reaches Eclipse.

Now Mikael Polo reaches Eclipse from the KN¿WHERE side.

Eclipse Becomes Another Convergence Event

That creates several independent routes:

Eric Mandala -----\
                   \
                    ECLIPSE
                   /
Nikoli -----------/
                  \
                   \
                 Mikael Polo
                       |
                       v
                   KN¿WHERE

That does not establish that all three people worked together.

It does not demonstrate a single organization.

But it tells us that several people from otherwise different portions of the network participate within the same broader transformational and psychedelic festival ecosystem.

There Are Now At Least Three Circuits

Once we stop trying to force everything into one chain, three broad social environments become visible.

1. The Devotional Music, Yoga and Wellness Circuit

Bhakti in the Woods
        |
  Ottawa / Gatineau
 kirtan and yoga network
     /    |     \
Rebecca Justine Andrew
   |       |      |
 Kevin   OMBuds --+
      \    |    /
        Gaiafest
           |
      Bhakti Bliss
           |
      Raven's Knoll

2. The Transformational and Electronic Festival Circuit

              Eclipse
             /   |   \
          Eric Nikoli Mikael
            |     |
        Gaiafest  Music.Art.Ppl
            |          |
            |      Ottawa EDM
            |          |
            +---- Sonic Springs

3. The DNR / KN¿WHERE Circuit

Toronto bass / EDM
       |
DNR Productions
       |
Nirvana Fernandez
       |
    KN¿WHERE
       |
       +---- DJs / electronic artists
       |
       +---- wellness programming
       |
    Mikael Polo
       |
Ontario psytrance /
Eclipse environment

And Then Raven’s Knoll Connects Two of Them Physically

BHAKTI BLISS
      |
      v
RAVEN'S KNOLL
      ^
      |
   KN¿WHERE

Raven’s Knoll remains significant.

But it is no longer the only place where the networks touch.

Different Bridges Perform Different Functions

This may be the most useful Organizational Behaviour finding so far.

People can be bridges.

Eric Mandala, Rebecca White Raven, Justine Hoang, Andrew Sass, Christine Lamothe, Tiina Kivinen, Nikoli and Mikael Polo all connect different portions of the ecosystem in different ways.

Festivals can be bridges.

Gaiafest and Eclipse appear particularly important because people from otherwise distinct communities pass through them.

Venues can be bridges.

Raven’s Knoll provides a physical convergence point for Bhakti Bliss and KN¿WHERE.

Informal communities can be bridges.

Ottawa-area kirtan circles, yoga communities and collectives such as Music.Art.Ppl maintain relationships between the larger formal events.

This Is Not One Organization

Nothing we have uncovered establishes a command structure connecting all these festivals.

There is no evidence presently supporting a simple chain such as:

Rainbow Family
      |
      v
Bhakti Bliss
      |
      v
KN¿WHERE

That would be an overstatement.

KN¿WHERE retains a strong independent lineage through DNR and Toronto electronic music.

Bhakti Bliss retains a strong lineage through Bhakti in the Woods and the regional kirtan and wellness community.

Rainbow Family has a much older and broader history of its own.

Eclipse, Gaiafest and Sonic Springs likewise have their own organizational identities.

The evidence supports network overlap, not one hidden organization.

The Full Picture Is Starting to Look Like This

                         RAINBOW
                            |
                       ERIC MANDALA
                      /      |       \
                     /       |        \
                 PAGAN    GAIAFEST   ECLIPSE
                           / |  \      / | \
                          /  |   \    /  |  \
                   REBECCA JUSTINE NIKOLI MIKAEL
                      |       |      |       |
                    KEVIN   ANDREW   |   Ontario
                       \     /       |   psytrance
                        \   /    Music.Art.Ppl
                     BHAKTI        |
                    NETWORK    Ottawa electronic
                       |            |
                 BHAKTI BLISS  SONIC SPRINGS
                       |
                       v
                 RAVEN'S KNOLL
                       ^
                       |
                       |
                    KN¿WHERE
                       ^
                       |
                DNR / Toronto EDM

The arrows in that diagram should not be interpreted as ownership or command.

They represent publicly visible participation, recurring relationships or organizational adjacency.

The Original Theory Was Too Simple

At the beginning, the network appeared to look something like:

Rainbow
   |
 Eric
   |
Bhakti
   |
Raven's Knoll
   |
KN¿WHERE

That was useful as an investigative starting point.

But it no longer survives the evidence very well.

The better model is:

Several long-running regional communities are connected by multiple boundary-spanning individuals, recurring performers, wellness practitioners, festival organizers, collectives, venues and shared cultural practices.

Some originate in Pagan and Rainbow-associated environments.

Some come from devotional music and yoga.

Some come from electronic music.

Some come from psytrance.

Some come from professional festival production.

Some move through several of these worlds.

And That Is What Makes This Interesting

The discovery is not that everyone secretly belongs to one organization.

Quite the opposite.

The interesting thing is that the network remains visible even after we remove the people we originally thought were holding it together.

Remove Eric and the Bhakti/Gaia network remains.

Remove Rebecca and Justine, Andrew, Christine and others still create recurring festival overlap.

Remove Raven’s Knoll and Eclipse still provides another convergence point.

Remove Eclipse and Gaiafest still connects devotional, wellness and electronic communities.

That means what we are observing is not simply one person’s social circle.

It looks much more like a genuine organizational ecosystem.

One Final Caution

Being part of the same festival ecosystem does not imply misconduct.

Appearing at the same festival does not establish friendship.

Sharing a stage does not establish organizational membership.

Sharing a venue does not establish common ownership.

And appearing within the same social network certainly does not establish conspiracy.

Those distinctions matter.

But they do not make the network meaningless.

Organizational Behaviour tells us exactly the opposite.

Informal relationships are often how communities actually function.

Information moves through people.

Opportunities move through people.

Performers recommend performers.

Organizers meet organizers.

Communities borrow practices from one another.

People return to events where they already know others.

And over years, apparently separate communities can become part of the same larger social ecosystem without ever becoming the same organization.

Where We Are Now

Our working conclusion has changed considerably.

We are not seeing one linear network built around Eric Mandala, Bhakti Bliss or Raven’s Knoll. We are seeing several established regional communities—including devotional music, yoga and wellness, Pagan and Rainbow-adjacent circles, Ottawa electronic arts, psytrance and professional festival production—connected through multiple people and convergence events. Gaiafest, Eclipse and Raven’s Knoll each appear to occupy important but different positions within that wider ecosystem.

That conclusion is less dramatic than claiming we discovered some hidden organization.

It is also considerably more interesting.

Because now we are not simply asking:

Who knows whom?

We can start asking:

Which people and events actually hold the network together?

And that is something we can begin measuring.

Expanding the Network

Network map highlighting Gaiafest as central node

Other Festivals Connecting Rainbow, Bhakti, Gaiafest and Raven’s Knoll

Our previous research mapped relationships between the Ontario Rainbow Family environment, Eric Mandala, Bhakti in the Woods, Bhakti Bliss, Raven’s Knoll and KN¿WHERE.

But there was an obvious next question:

What happens if we stop looking only at those events and search for these same people across other festivals?

That changes the picture considerably.

Instead of one straight chain of relationships, we begin seeing several overlapping festival circuits.

And one festival in particular becomes much more important:

Gaiafest.

How I Am Classifying the Connections

For this comparison, I am using four basic categories.

  • Confirmed: A reliable public festival listing, program, biography or event announcement identifies the person.
  • Repeated: The person appears repeatedly or across multiple years.
  • Organizer or leadership connection: Public material identifies the person as helping organize, establish or lead the event.
  • Unknown: I have not yet found sufficient public evidence to establish the connection.

Importantly, unknown does not mean absent.

It simply means that I do not currently have enough evidence to responsibly mark the connection as confirmed.

The Expanded Festival Matrix

Person Rainbow Paganfest / Harvest Bhakti in the Woods Peterborough Yoga City of Om / 24Hr Eclipse Gaiafest Rooted Wellness Bhakti Bliss Ozora KN¿WHERE
Eric Mandala Repeated Repeated Unknown Unknown Unknown Confirmed Repeated Unknown Repeated Confirmed Unknown
Rebecca White Raven Unknown Unknown Organizer / Repeated Confirmed Confirmed Unknown Confirmed Confirmed Organizer / Repeated Unknown Unknown
Kevin Guerette Unknown Unknown Confirmed / Repeated Confirmed Unknown Unknown Confirmed Confirmed Repeated Unknown Unknown
Justine Hoang / Anjali Om Unknown Unknown Confirmed Confirmed Confirmed / Repeated Unknown Confirmed Confirmed Repeated Unknown Unknown
Andrew Sass Unknown Unknown Confirmed Possible Unknown Unknown Confirmed Unknown Repeated Unknown Unknown

Gaiafest Becomes a Major Network Node

This may be the strongest finding produced by expanding the investigation.

Eric Mandala appears repeatedly at Gaiafest.

But Gaiafest is not simply another festival where Eric happens to perform.

Public festival material also places Rebecca White Raven, Justine Hoang and Andrew Sass within Gaiafest programming.

Rebecca and Kevin Guerette have also appeared there through their chanting and kirtan work.

That gives us something much more significant:

                 ERIC
                   |
                   |
REBECCA -------- GAIAFEST -------- JUSTINE
   |               |
 KEVIN           ANDREW

This matters because these people also appear within the Bhakti network.

Gaiafest therefore represents an independent festival where several members of the same social network reappear together.

That is stronger evidence of an informal community network than finding one person appearing at several unrelated events.

Peterborough Yoga Festival Creates Another Cluster

Rebecca White Raven and Kevin Guerette have publicly identified Peterborough Yoga Festival among the festivals where they have led kirtan.

Justine Hoang also appears in Peterborough Yoga Festival material.

That creates another intersection:

Rebecca ---------+
Kevin ------------+---- Peterborough Yoga Festival
Justine ----------+

Again, this is important because Peterborough Yoga Festival is neither Bhakti Bliss nor Gaiafest.

We are seeing members of the same regional community repeatedly appearing within independently branded events.

Rooted in Wellness Shows the Same Pattern

Rooted in Wellness Festival material also identifies members of this network.

Justine Hoang appears offering kirtan.

Rebecca White Raven appears through sound and wellness programming.

Rebecca and Kevin have also identified Rooted in Wellness among the festivals where they have led kirtan.

Rebecca ---------+
Kevin ------------+---- Rooted in Wellness
Justine ----------+

This reinforces the possibility that we are looking at a recognizable Ottawa–Gatineau yoga, kirtan, wellness and alternative spirituality festival circuit.

That does not mean these festivals are controlled by the same organization.

It means they repeatedly draw participants, facilitators and performers from the same regional social network.

City of Om Pushes the Network Further Back

The connections also predate Bhakti Bliss.

Rebecca White Raven was publicly appearing at Ottawa’s City of Om by 2018.

Justine Hoang also appears within City of Om programming.

Justine has additionally participated in 24Hr Yogapalooza and related Ottawa yoga activities.

This tells us something important about the timeline.

The network did not originate with Bhakti Bliss in 2023.

Several of the people who would later appear together at Bhakti Bliss were already circulating through Ottawa-area yoga, devotional music and wellness events years earlier.

Andrew Sass Becomes Easier to Place

Andrew Sass remains a person for whom careful identification is particularly important.

His Bhakti Bliss involvement is strongly documented.

He has appeared in partner yoga with Justine Hoang, songwriting programming and musical performances involving the OMBuds.

Public material also connects Andrew Sass with the earlier Bhakti in the Woods community.

Gaiafest provides another confirmed festival environment in which Andrew appears.

His presently supportable network therefore resembles:

Bhakti in the Woods
        |
        v
    Andrew Sass
       /     \
      /       \
   OMBuds    Gaiafest
      \
       \
    Bhakti Bliss

I would still treat Peterborough Yoga Festival as a weaker Andrew connection until clearer documentation is located.

It is important not to upgrade a possible connection simply because it would make the network diagram look cleaner.

Eric Mandala Occupies a Different Network Position

The expanded matrix makes something else much clearer.

Rebecca, Kevin, Justine and Andrew are heavily concentrated within a regional yoga, kirtan, Bhakti and wellness network.

Eric Mandala enters that environment as well.

But his documented activities extend considerably farther outside it.

Paganfest

Eric Mandala and Zu Zen have appeared within Ontario Paganfest programming.

This provides a direct connection between Eric’s musical and spiritual work and Ontario Pagan festival culture.

Harvest Festival

Eric also appears within surviving programming associated with Wiccan Harvest Fest.

Again, that places him within a Pagan festival environment independent of Bhakti Bliss.

Eclipse Festival

Eclipse Festival provides another important bridge.

Its 2022 artist material includes Eric Mandala, Zu Zen and The Rainbow Tribe.

This moves Eric directly into a psychedelic, transformational and electronic festival environment.

Gaiafest

Eric then intersects with the Ottawa–Gatineau Bhakti and wellness network at Gaiafest.

Ozora

His network reaches internationally as well.

The official OZORA Festival program has listed an Eric Mandala ecstatic dance and chakra balancing experience.

This places him within one of the better-known international transformational and psychedelic festival environments.

Eric’s Network Looks Different

Ontario Rainbow
       |
       |
   ERIC MANDALA
    /    |      |      \
   /     |      |       \
Pagan  Bhakti  Gaia    Eclipse
Fest   Bliss   Fest       |
                           |
                  psychedelic /
               electronic festival
                     culture
                           |
                         Ozora

This is a strong example of what Organizational Behaviour and social network theory describe as boundary spanning.

A boundary spanner moves between communities that are related but not identical.

They can carry:

  • relationships;
  • ideas;
  • music;
  • ritual practices;
  • organizational knowledge;
  • contacts;
  • reputations;
  • and opportunities.

Eric therefore appears to occupy a different network position than many of the other people we have been examining.

Two Networks Are Becoming Visible

The expanded investigation suggests that we can now distinguish at least two overlapping networks.

Network One: Ottawa–Gatineau Bhakti and Wellness

Rebecca White Raven
       |
Kevin Guerette
       |
Justine Hoang
       |
Andrew Sass
       |
OMBuds
       |
       +---- Bhakti in the Woods
       |
       +---- Peterborough Yoga Festival
       |
       +---- City of Om
       |
       +---- Rooted in Wellness
       |
       +---- Gaiafest
       |
       +---- Bhakti Bliss

The exact connections vary from person to person.

But the repeated clustering is becoming increasingly apparent.

This looks less like random festival appearances and more like a recognizable regional community of performers, teachers and facilitators.

Network Two: The Eric Mandala Boundary-Spanning Network

Rainbow
   |
Pagan community
   |
Eric Mandala
   |
   +---- Paganfest
   |
   +---- Harvest Fest
   |
   +---- Bhakti Bliss
   |
   +---- Gaiafest
   |
   +---- Eclipse Festival
   |
   +---- Ozora

These two networks intersect most visibly at Bhakti Bliss and Gaiafest.

That is considerably stronger than simply saying that Eric knows people involved with Bhakti.

Now Let’s Put the Two Networks Together

                        RAINBOW
                           |
                           |
                     ERIC MANDALA
                    /      |       \
                   /       |        \
            PAGANFEST   ECLIPSE    OZORA
                 \         |
                  \        |
                   GAIAFEST
                  /   |    \
                 /    |     \
          REBECCA   JUSTINE  ANDREW
              |        |       |
            KEVIN    OMBuds ---+
              \        /
               \      /
           BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
                    |
                    v
              BHAKTI BLISS
                    |
                    v
              RAVEN'S KNOLL
                    ^
                    |
                    |
                KN¿WHERE
                    |
                    v
               DNR / EDM

Following the Threads

Timeline 1970-2026 showing overlapping festival networks

A Timeline of Rainbow, Bhakti, KN¿WHERE and Raven’s Knoll

In the previous post, we mapped the relationships we could actually document between the Ontario Rainbow Family environment, Eric Mandala, Bhakti in the Woods, Bhakti Bliss, Raven’s Knoll and KN¿WHERE.

That map told us who connects to whom.

It did not tell us something equally important:

When did those connections appear?

So this time I want to take the organizational chart off the wall entirely and put the network on a timeline.

And I am not limiting this to Raven’s Knoll.

We are going to follow the major threads independently and see when they eventually begin crossing one another.

Before We Start: What This Timeline Does Not Prove

Shared people, venues, terminology or cultural practices do not establish that one organization controls another.

This timeline documents publicly visible relationships and organizational development.

It should not be read as suggesting wrongdoing, secret coordination or common ownership where the evidence does not establish those things.

In fact, one of the most interesting things about the timeline is that these communities appear to have independent histories before portions of their networks begin to overlap.

1970–1972: The Rainbow Family Background

The oldest organizational tradition in this story is the Rainbow Family of Living Light.

Cornell University’s archival collection describes the Rainbow Family as a countercultural movement established around 1970, while the first major Rainbow Gathering took place in Colorado in 1972. Over subsequent decades, Rainbow gatherings developed internationally and through regional networks.

That matters because the Rainbow network does not originate with Eric Mandala, Bhakti Bliss, Raven’s Knoll or anything happening recently in eastern Ontario.

It is the oldest cultural stream in our timeline.

2009: Raven’s Knoll Opens

Raven’s Knoll represents another independent organizational stream.

The Pagan-owned campground opened its gates in 2009 and developed as a location for Pagan festivals, ritual spaces and community gatherings. By 2017, reporting on Raven’s Knoll described numerous permanent sacred sites created through repeated community use and a devoted volunteer and festival community.

Again, at this point there is no need to connect Raven’s Knoll to Rainbow or Bhakti.

It has its own origin story.

2010–2012: Raven’s Knoll Begins Diversifying

Something worth noticing occurs quite early.

Although Paganism remained central to Raven’s Knoll’s identity, the property was not used exclusively for religious events. Outdoor film screenings were being held there by 2010 and 2011.

In 2012, the first Hail and Horn Gathering also established a permanent Heathen sacred enclosure on the property.

So even in Raven’s Knoll’s early years we can see two things happening simultaneously:

a strong Pagan religious identity and an ability to function as a broader event venue.

2011–2012: Rainbow Gatherings in Quebec

Meanwhile, Rainbow gathering culture was independently active in eastern Canada.

Photographic documentation exists for Rainbow Gatherings in Quebec in 2011 and 2012.

This is important geographically.

The eastern Canadian Rainbow network was already operating within the Ontario-Quebec social environment before the Bhakti network we are about to examine reached maturity.

2012: Bhakti in the Woods Begins

Now another thread appears.

A retrospective account of Bhakti in the Woods says that in 2012 a small group gathered on rural property near Ladysmith, Quebec, for a weekend involving chanting, music, meditation and other activities.

The informal gathering proved successful enough that organizers planned another edition for 2013.

This is the beginning of the Bhakti in the Woods lineage.

2012

RAINBOW NETWORK              RAVEN'S KNOLL
      |                           |
      |                           |
      |                     Pagan/event community
      |
Eastern Canada

              BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
                     begins

At this stage, these are better understood as separate networks occupying partly overlapping geographic territory.

2013–2014: Bhakti Becomes a Recurring Festival

The 2012 gathering was followed by a second event in 2013. By August 2014, Bhakti in the Woods was being publicly advertised as a multi-day festival hosted by The Bhakti Connection near Ladysmith.

Meanwhile, the international Rainbow movement held a World Rainbow Gathering on Vancouver Island in 2013, illustrating the broader Canadian presence of the movement beyond the Ontario-Quebec network.

2015–2017: Bhakti Builds Community Infrastructure

By 2015, Bhakti in the Woods was receiving attention within Ottawa’s independent music community.

By 2017, a Quebec yoga source described the festival as being in its fifth edition and traced it directly back to the original 2012 gathering.

This is an important Organizational Behaviour stage.

Bhakti in the Woods was no longer simply an event.

It was developing organizational memory.

People returned.

Performers returned.

Relationships accumulated.

A recognizable community began forming around the gathering.

2016: Ontario Rainbow Becomes Visible in Our Specific Network

By July 2016, publicly indexed material documents an Ontario Rainbow Gathering and includes Eric Mandala participating in the Ontario Rainbow Family discussion surrounding the gathering.

This is one of the earliest points in this investigation where Eric becomes visible inside the specific Ontario Rainbow network we have been tracing.

That does not mean his involvement necessarily began in 2016.

It means 2016 is an early point we can currently document.

2018: Bhakti Explicitly Describes Itself as a Network

Then we find something particularly useful.

A 2018 fundraiser for Bhakti in the Woods described the festival as a small, grassroots and non-corporate event and specifically talked about networking with smaller Canadian companies, yoga studios and related organizations. It was identified as the third annual fundraiser supporting musicians and kirtan performers appearing at that year’s festival.

This is important because we do not have to infer that networking was part of the Bhakti model.

The community itself was talking about networking.

From an OB perspective, we are seeing the deliberate development of an organizational ecosystem.

2018–2019: The Ottawa Bhakti Cluster Becomes Visible

People who later become familiar within Bhakti Bliss were already moving through Ottawa’s yoga and devotional-music community.

Justine Hoang appears in yoga retreats in 2018 and in Ottawa kirtan programming during 2019. Rebecca White Raven appears in collaborative sound-healing programming during the same period.

This is useful because it shows that these relationships did not suddenly materialize when Bhakti Bliss appeared.

There was already a local social infrastructure.

2019: Several Threads Move Much Closer Together

2019 is one of the most interesting years in the timeline.

Bhakti in the Woods ran August 16–18, describing itself in terms of community, sacred sound, healing and belonging.

During the same general period, Eric Mandala is publicly documented performing at an Ontario/Quebec Rainbow Gathering with The Rainbow Tribe.

Eric was also performing at Paganfest in Ontario that year, where promotional material described his work in ecstatic dance, kirtan and international world music.

Now our networks begin looking less isolated:

ONTARIO / QUEBEC RAINBOW
          |
          |
      ERIC MANDALA
       /         \
      /           \
Pagan events    ecstatic dance /
                 kirtan culture


          BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
                 |
          Ottawa yoga/kirtan
              community

We still do not have evidence here of one organization directing another.

What we have is increasing social proximity.

2020: Connections Continue Outside Festivals

The network does not disappear when the major festivals stop.

In January 2020, Yogalaya advertised a Guatemala retreat co-led by Stacey L.A. Sinclair and Eric Mandala involving yoga, meditation, music, kirtan, sound healing and ceremony. The same Ottawa yoga network also included Justine Hoang in other retreat programming.

This is a good example of why counting festival posters alone does not fully reveal a network.

Relationships continue between festivals.

2021: “Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe” Becomes a Recorded Musical Identity

In 2021, Eric Mandala and The Rainbow Tribe released recorded music together, including Warriors of Light Unite.

That gives the Rainbow Tribe name a public musical identity separate from the much older Rainbow Family itself.

This distinction matters.

Rainbow Family and Eric Mandala’s Rainbow Tribe should not automatically be treated as interchangeable organizations.

There is documented overlap through Eric, but they are not simply two names for the same entity.

2022: A Major Transition Year

Bhakti in the Woods took place near Ladysmith again in August 2022. Multiple independent performer calendars document the festival that year.

This appears to have been the conclusion of its ten-year run.

Public biographical material concerning Rebecca White Raven states that she had helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and, after the festival ended its ten-year run, initiated Bhakti Bliss.

At almost exactly the same historical moment, another interesting crossover appears: Eclipse Festival’s 2022 artist roster included Eric Mandala & Zu Zen & The Rainbow Tribe.

That places Eric’s Rainbow Tribe project inside a broader electronic and transformational-festival environment before Bhakti Bliss begins.

2023: Two New Organizational Forms Appear

2023 is perhaps the most important year in the entire map.

Bhakti Bliss begins.

Its first documented Raven’s Knoll edition ran August 18–20, 2023. The program included Rebecca White Raven and Kevin Guerette, Eric Mandala & Zu Zen, the Om Buds, Justine Hoang and Andrew Sass among others.

The festival publicly announced Raven’s Knoll as its new location in February 2023.

That gives us a very clear succession:

BHakti in the Woods
     2012–2022
          |
          | people / culture / relationships
          v
     BHAKTI BLISS
          2023
          |
          v
    RAVEN'S KNOLL

But 2023 is important for another reason.

DNR Productions was also already using the KN¿WHERE name in its Toronto event community by this period. Indexed DNR social material from early 2023 refers to “DNR Presents KNWHERE” and frames it around music, art, community and connection.

KN¿WHERE therefore did not simply appear from nowhere as a giant outdoor festival in 2025.

Its own current history describes the camping festival as the evolution of DNR’s earlier indoor KN¿WHERE shows in Toronto.

That gives us another independent lineage:

DNR PRODUCTIONS
       |
       v
Toronto KN¿WHERE shows
       |
       v
KN¿WHERE camping festival

2024: The Networks Mature Independently

Bhakti Bliss returned to Raven’s Knoll August 16–18, 2024.

Eric Mandala continued releasing music under the Rainbow Tribe identity, including Prophecy of Peace in 2024.

DNR, meanwhile, publicly described itself as a Toronto-based EDM event company focused on immersive experiences, community and PLUR values. Its privacy documentation for KN¿WHERE was in place by November 2024.

The significant thing here is that Bhakti Bliss and DNR/KN¿WHERE still appear to be evolving along separate organizational paths.

2025: The Networks Converge on the Same Venue

Then 2025 changes the map.

In April, KN¿WHERE announced what contemporary reporting called its first-ever festival lineup. DNR Productions was identified as the festival organizer, with a September 12–14 debut planned.

The proposed venue changed during development. Older KN¿WHERE web material identified Camp Walden in Palmer Rapids, while early promotional reporting also referenced festival grounds on Cedar Grove Road.

By June 2025, KN¿WHERE publicly announced Raven’s Knoll as its new venue.

At virtually the same time, Bhakti Bliss was continuing its established annual relationship with Raven’s Knoll, with its August 15–17, 2025 lineup again featuring people including Rebecca White Raven, Justine Hoang and Andrew Sass.

Now, for the first time, two independently developed festival networks converge on one property:

BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
        |
        v
   BHAKTI BLISS
        |
        |
        v
   RAVEN'S KNOLL
        ^
        |
        |
     KN¿WHERE
        ^
        |
        |
DNR / Toronto bass scene

That is the organizational turning point.

2025: KN¿WHERE Does Not Take Place at Raven’s Knoll

The planned September 2025 Raven’s Knoll edition did not ultimately occur there.

In August, organizers announced that wildfire risk prevented the festival from being held at Raven’s Knoll and moved the planned event to Toronto. Ticket holders were also promised entry to a subsequent Raven’s Knoll edition scheduled for June 2026.

So organizationally, 2025 establishes the Raven’s Knoll relationship, but not yet the completed outdoor event.

2026: KN¿WHERE Finally Happens at Raven’s Knoll

KN¿WHERE returned to the Raven’s Knoll plan for June 5–7, 2026. The official festival material described three stages, camping, art and daily wellness and workshop programming.

The 2026 event did in fact take place. Contemporary local reporting described the June event as the inaugural KN¿WHERE Music Festival at the Raven’s Knoll property.

Bhakti Bliss, meanwhile, remains scheduled at Raven’s Knoll for August 7–9, 2026.

Now Look at the Whole Timeline

1970/72
RAINBOW FAMILY
     |
     v
Regional / international Rainbow networks
     |
2011–12 Quebec Rainbow gatherings
     |
2016 Ontario Rainbow activity
     |
2019 Ontario/Quebec Rainbow Gathering
     |
ERIC MANDALA
     |
     +-------- Rainbow Tribe musical project
     |             |
     |            2021+
     |
     +-------- ecstatic dance / kirtan /
               transformational festival network
                         |
                         |
                         v

2012  BHAKTI IN THE WOODS begins
           |
           |
      recurring Ottawa/
      Gatineau community
           |
     Rebecca / Justine /
     musicians / teachers
           |
          2022
           |
           v
      BHAKTI BLISS
          2023
           |
           v
      RAVEN'S KNOLL
           ^
           |
           |
          2025
           |
     KN¿WHERE FESTIVAL
           ^
           |
     Toronto KN¿WHERE
        shows
           ^
           |
     DNR PRODUCTIONS

What Does the Timeline Actually Tell Us?

The most important finding is what it doesn’t show.

It does not show one organization appearing and spawning everything else.

The roots are separate.

Rainbow culture is decades older than everything else in this story.

Raven’s Knoll develops from Ontario Pagan festival culture beginning in 2009.

Bhakti in the Woods develops independently near Ladysmith beginning in 2012.

DNR develops within Toronto’s EDM scene, with KN¿WHERE first existing as an indoor event concept before becoming a camping festival.

These are distinct organizational histories.

Then the Bridges Appear

The interesting part is what happens later.

Eric Mandala provides one visible bridge between Rainbow culture, kirtan, ecstatic dance and transformational festival environments. His documented participation spans Ontario Rainbow activity, the Ontario/Quebec Rainbow Gathering, Paganfest, the Rainbow Tribe musical project, Eclipse Festival and eventually Bhakti Bliss.

Rebecca White Raven creates another bridge, independently of Eric, through Bhakti in the Woods and the creation of Bhakti Bliss.

Justine Hoang, Andrew Sass, the Om Buds and other recurring participants help demonstrate the persistence of the Ottawa-area yoga and kirtan social network into Bhakti Bliss.

And Raven’s Knoll eventually becomes the physical node at which Bhakti Bliss and KN¿WHERE both operate.

But There Is Still a Missing Link

This is important.

I still do not see evidence establishing a direct organizational chain such as:

Rainbow Family → Bhakti Bliss → KN¿WHERE.

Nor do I see evidence that Bhakti Bliss organizers created KN¿WHERE.

KN¿WHERE has its own documented DNR lineage.

Likewise, Andrew Sass is well documented within Bhakti Bliss, but we have not established him as a KN¿WHERE organizer or performer.

The strongest connection between the Bhakti and KN¿WHERE organizational branches remains Raven’s Knoll itself.

The Organizational Behaviour Interpretation

From an OB perspective, what we are seeing is not organizational merger.

It is network convergence.

Several independently developed communities become increasingly connected because people move between them, cultural practices travel with those people, relationships accumulate, and eventually common venues and events place portions of those networks into closer proximity.

That process can occur without a central authority directing it.

It is exactly what social-network theory would predict.

There Is Another Pattern Worth Noticing

Look at the language used across otherwise separate communities.

Bhakti in the Woods described itself around community, belonging, sacred sound and healing.

DNR describes its events around unity, immersive experience and community.

KN¿WHERE combines electronic music with wellness, art, workshops and connection.

Bhakti Bliss combines music, yoga, ecstatic dance, workshops, camping and community.

These are not identical cultures.

But they contain enough compatible organizational language and practices that movement between them becomes easier to understand.

The Bigger Finding

Originally, the question was whether one person connected Rainbow, Bhakti and the newer festival community.

The timeline now suggests something more complicated.

No single person appears necessary to explain the entire network.

Eric is an important boundary spanner.

Rebecca represents organizational continuity from Bhakti in the Woods into Bhakti Bliss.

Other Ottawa-area participants maintain a recurring devotional-music and yoga network.

DNR independently supplies the Toronto bass-music branch.

And Raven’s Knoll eventually provides a physical place where two of those organizational streams converge.

So rather than this:

PERSON
  |
controls everything

the evidence looks considerably more like this:

             RAINBOW
                |
             people
                |
          ERIC MANDALA
                |
               / \
              /   \
         KIRTAN   FESTIVAL
          NETWORK  CULTURE
              \     /
               \   /
            BHAKTI NETWORK
                 |
          BHAKTI BLISS
                 |
                 v
           RAVEN'S KNOLL
                 ^
                 |
              KN¿WHERE
                 |
                 v
          DNR / EDM NETWORK

And That Changes the Question Again

The question is no longer:

“Who connects all these groups?”

There may not be one answer.

The better question is:

“What people, practices, venues and relationships allowed previously separate communities to become increasingly interconnected?”

That is organizational behaviour.

And now that we have both the network map and the timeline, we can begin distinguishing coincidence from meaningful organizational continuity.

Perhaps the most revealing finding so far is that the story does not begin with KN¿WHERE.

It does not begin with Raven’s Knoll.

And it does not begin with Eric Mandala.

Several communities were already developing independently for years.

What changed was that, over time, some of their paths began to cross.

Mapping the Network

Network diagram of festivals linked by venue

What We Can Actually Prove About Bhakti, Rainbow, KN¿WHERE and Raven’s Knoll

In the last post, I approached the connections we have been finding through the lens of Organizational Behaviour.

The conclusion was fairly simple:

What we appear to be seeing is not evidence of one secret organization. We are seeing an overlapping social network.

That raises an obvious question.

Can we actually map it?

More importantly, can we distinguish between a relationship we can document, a repeated association, a weak connection and something that remains speculation?

Let’s try.

First, the Rules

For this exercise, I am using four categories.

CONFIRMED: A publicly available source directly establishes the relationship.

REPEATED: The same individual or organization appears repeatedly within the same network, making the relationship stronger than a single appearance.

WEAK TIE: There is some evidence connecting two parts of the network, but not enough to establish an organizational relationship.

NOT ESTABLISHED: We looked for the connection but currently do not have sufficient public evidence to say it exists.

This distinction matters because appearing at the same festival does not make two people business partners. Performing at an event does not make someone an organizer. Knowing somebody does not establish control.

The Network in One Picture

ONTARIO RAINBOW FAMILY
        |
        | documented association
        v
   ERIC MANDALA
        |
        | performer / facilitator
        v
   BHAKTI BLISS  <---------- REBECCA WHITE RAVEN
        |                          ^
        |                          |
        |                    helped organize
        |                          |
        |                  BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
        |
        | recurring participants
        |
   ANDREW SASS
   JUSTINE HOANG
   OMBUDS
   REBECCA WHITE RAVEN
   ERIC MANDALA
        |
        |
        v
    RAVEN'S KNOLL
        ^
        |
        | venue
        |
     KN¿WHERE

That is the basic network.

But the individual connections deserve a closer look.

CONFIRMED: Bhakti in the Woods → Rebecca White Raven → Bhakti Bliss

This may be the most important connection we have uncovered because it is considerably stronger than simple performer overlap.

A public biography for Rebecca White Raven states that she helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and, after that festival ended its ten-year run, initiated Bhakti Bliss as a not-for-profit organization.

That means Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss are not merely two unrelated yoga festivals that happened to attract some of the same people.

There is a direct human bridge between them.

From an Organizational Behaviour perspective, this is an example of organizational continuity through people.

An organization or event may disappear while portions of its community, knowledge, practices, relationships and culture continue through a successor organization.

That does not mean Bhakti Bliss and Bhakti in the Woods are legally the same organization.

It means there is a documented line of continuity between the two.

CONFIRMED: Bhakti Bliss → Raven’s Knoll

This connection is equally straightforward.

Bhakti Bliss was held at Raven’s Knoll in August 2023. The event listing identifies Raven’s Knoll as the venue and lists a substantial program of music, yoga, workshops and ecstatic dance.

The relationship continued. Bhakti Bliss’s own 2025 lineup identifies Raven’s Knoll as its location, and the official Bhakti Bliss site identifies Raven’s Knoll as the location of its August 7–9, 2026 festival.

So Raven’s Knoll is not connected to Bhakti Bliss through a speculative chain of acquaintances.

It is the festival’s documented recurring venue.

CONFIRMED: KN¿WHERE → Raven’s Knoll

The KN¿WHERE connection is just as direct.

The festival’s official website identifies its June 5–7, 2026 event as taking place at Raven’s Knoll, 10441 Highway 60 in Eganville.

That gives us our first very important piece of the network map:

BHAKTI BLISS
      |
      v
RAVEN'S KNOLL
      ^
      |
   KN¿WHERE

These events do not need to share organizers to be connected.

They already share the same venue.

CONFIRMED: Eric Mandala → Ontario Rainbow Family

Publicly indexed material from the Ontario Rainbow Family community repeatedly contains Eric Mandala’s postings about Ontario Rainbow gatherings and his Rainbow Tribe activities. One indexed Ontario Rainbow Family result identifies him as an administrator. Other results promote “Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe.”

Eric himself has also publicly posted material from an Ontario Rainbow Gathering in Canada.

Whatever broader interpretation one places on that relationship, the basic association is not speculative.

Eric Mandala is publicly associated with the Ontario Rainbow Family network.

CONFIRMED: Eric Mandala → Bhakti Bliss

Eric also appears repeatedly within Bhakti Bliss.

The 2023 Bhakti Bliss program at Raven’s Knoll lists Eric Mandala & Zu Zen among its musical performers and lists Eric separately as one of the ecstatic dance facilitators.

Bhakti Bliss also listed him in its 2025 programming, and its official site promoted his return for a kirtan performance at the August 2026 festival.

This creates another documented chain:

ONTARIO RAINBOW FAMILY
        |
        v
   ERIC MANDALA
        |
        v
   BHAKTI BLISS
        |
        v
   RAVEN'S KNOLL

Eric therefore qualifies quite comfortably as what Organizational Behaviour and social network theory would call a boundary spanner.

He visibly participates across more than one community.

But there is an important distinction.

His presence demonstrates a bridge between networks.

It does not demonstrate that Ontario Rainbow Family controls Bhakti Bliss or Raven’s Knoll.

But Eric Is Not the Only Bridge

This was one of the questions that originally prompted this investigation.

If Eric were the only person connecting these communities, we would have a fairly simple network.

He is not.

Rebecca White Raven independently creates another route:

BHAKTI IN THE WOODS
        |
        v
REBECCA WHITE RAVEN
        |
        v
    BHAKTI BLISS
        |
        v
   RAVEN'S KNOLL

That is important.

It means the Bhakti-to-Raven’s-Knoll connection does not depend upon Eric Mandala at all.

CONFIRMED: Andrew Sass → Bhakti Bliss

Then there is Andrew.

We need to be particularly careful here because searching festival material produces several people named Andrew.

The Andrew we can positively identify within the Bhakti network is Andrew Sass.

The 2023 Bhakti Bliss program identifies Andrew Sass by name in partner yoga with Justine Hoang and in a songwriting workshop. It also lists the Om Buds as “Justine & Andrew.”

The identification becomes considerably stronger through material from the OMBuds themselves, which describes Andrew Sass as an OMBuds member and songwriter.

Bhakti Bliss continued to feature Andrew Sass in 2025, listing him both as a yoga instructor and musician.

And Bhakti Bliss has promoted his return again for its 2026 festival.

So this is not a one-off appearance.

Andrew Sass is a recurring participant within the Bhakti Bliss network.

CONFIRMED: Justine Hoang and the OMBuds

Justine Hoang is another recurring connection.

Public event records place her within the Ottawa-area kirtan community and around Bhakti in the Woods programming, while Bhakti Bliss programs repeatedly include her individually and alongside Andrew Sass.

Andrew Sass and Justine Hoang are also publicly connected through the OMBuds.

This starts producing a cluster rather than a single line:

              REBECCA
                 |
                 |
BHakti in Woods--+----Bhakti Bliss
                       /   |   \
                      /    |    \
                 Andrew  Justine  Eric
                    \      /
                     OMBuds

That is what an informal organizational network actually looks like.

There is no need for everyone to report to the same leader.

There is no need for a central office.

There is no need for a secret organizational chart.

The relationships themselves create the network.

A Correction: The “Andrew” Question

This investigation also illustrates exactly why names need to be checked carefully.

KN¿WHERE’s publicly indexed Facebook material associates one of its posts with a person named Andrew Phillips Cadogan.

The Bhakti participant we have documented is Andrew Sass.

Those are different full names.

I have not found reliable evidence establishing that Andrew Sass and Andrew Phillips Cadogan are the same person, and there is no responsible basis for treating them as such.

At this stage, I therefore do not consider Andrew Sass → KN¿WHERE a confirmed connection.

That is exactly the type of distinction this mapping exercise is intended to preserve.

REPEATED: The Bhakti Bliss Cluster

The 2023 Bhakti Bliss program is particularly useful because several names we have encountered elsewhere appear together in one documented event at Raven’s Knoll.

Among them were Eric Mandala, Rebecca White Raven, Kevin Guerette, Justine Hoang and Andrew Sass. The program also included the OMBuds.

By 2025, Andrew Sass, Rebecca White Raven and Justine were again appearing in Bhakti Bliss programming at Raven’s Knoll.

That is what changes this from random co-appearance to a recognizable community network.

The same people continue to circulate through the same organizational environment.

The Venue May Be the Most Important Node

Initially, we were concentrating heavily on people.

But the network map suggests something else.

Raven’s Knoll itself may be one of the most important boundary-spanning nodes.

Consider what is documented:

BHakti in the Woods
        |
        | Rebecca
        v
   Bhakti Bliss
        |
        |
        v
   RAVEN'S KNOLL
        ^
        |
        |
     KN¿WHERE

Bhakti Bliss repeatedly brought one cultural network onto the property.

KN¿WHERE brought another.

Raven’s Knoll is the place where those otherwise quite different festival environments intersect.

That does not prove that one caused the other.

It does demonstrate that Raven’s Knoll became capable of accommodating both.

Where Does Rainbow Fit?

The Rainbow connection is more specific.

At present, the strongest documented bridge I have found runs through Eric Mandala.

ONTARIO RAINBOW FAMILY
        |
        v
   ERIC MANDALA
        |
        v
    BHAKTI BLISS
        |
        v
   RAVEN'S KNOLL

That is a real connection.

But it would be an overstatement to transform that into:

Rainbow Family → controls → Bhakti Bliss → controls → Raven’s Knoll.

We have not established anything resembling that.

The evidence shows overlapping participation and relationships.

And Where Does KN¿WHERE Fit?

Interestingly, KN¿WHERE remains somewhat separated from the personal network we have mapped.

Its strongest confirmed connection to everything above is presently the venue:

BHAKTI NETWORK
      |
      v
RAVEN'S KNOLL
      ^
      |
      |
  KN¿WHERE

I have not found evidence establishing that Eric Mandala organizes KN¿WHERE.

I have not found evidence establishing that Andrew Sass organizes or performs at KN¿WHERE.

I have not found evidence that Ontario Rainbow Family organizes KN¿WHERE.

And I have not found evidence demonstrating that Bhakti Bliss organizes KN¿WHERE.

Those distinctions need to remain explicit.

What Is Actually Significant?

The interesting finding is therefore subtler than a claim that everything is connected to everything else.

There are really several layers.

Layer One: Organizational succession.

Bhakti in the Woods is directly connected to Bhakti Bliss through Rebecca White Raven.

Layer Two: Recurring community participants.

People such as Rebecca, Andrew Sass, Justine Hoang and Eric Mandala repeatedly appear around Bhakti Bliss and related spiritual, yoga, kirtan and ecstatic-dance communities.

Layer Three: Boundary spanning.

Eric Mandala provides a documented bridge between Ontario Rainbow Family circles and Bhakti Bliss.

Layer Four: The venue.

Bhakti Bliss and KN¿WHERE independently converge on Raven’s Knoll.

What We Cannot Say

This research does not establish that Rainbow Family operates Bhakti Bliss.

It does not establish that Bhakti Bliss operates KN¿WHERE.

It does not establish that KN¿WHERE is a Rainbow event.

It does not establish that Raven’s Knoll belongs to some larger hidden organization.

It does not establish wrongdoing by any of the individuals named here.

And sharing a venue, performer, organizer or social connection is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself.

What We Can Say

We can now say something considerably more precise.

Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss have a documented line of organizational continuity through Rebecca White Raven. Bhakti Bliss has repeatedly operated at Raven’s Knoll. Eric Mandala provides a documented social bridge between the Ontario Rainbow Family environment and Bhakti Bliss. KN¿WHERE independently connects to the same Raven’s Knoll venue. Around those core relationships sits a recurring Ottawa-area network of kirtan, yoga, ecstatic-dance and spiritual-community participants.

That is not speculation.

That is what the publicly available relationships presently support.

And From an Organizational Behaviour Perspective…

This is almost a textbook example of why an organizational chart alone cannot explain how communities operate.

The important structure is partly invisible.

It consists of:

  • personal relationships;
  • recurring participants;
  • trusted performers;
  • organizers who create successor events;
  • people who move between communities;
  • shared cultural practices;
  • and venues capable of bringing otherwise separate networks into the same physical space.

That is the informal organization.

And something else becomes apparent once we draw the relationships rather than simply listing names.

Eric Mandala is a bridge, but he is not the bridge upon which the entire network depends.

The Bhakti in the Woods → Rebecca White Raven → Bhakti Bliss → Raven’s Knoll route exists independently of him.

Likewise, KN¿WHERE’s connection to Raven’s Knoll exists independently of the Bhakti network.

What we therefore have is not one chain.

We have several chains converging on common people, communities and eventually a common place.

That is a network.

And now that we can see its structure, the next question becomes much more interesting:

When did these relationships begin converging on Raven’s Knoll, and can we reconstruct that evolution year by year?

Because if we can, we may be able to see not simply who is connected, but how Raven’s Knoll’s event culture changed over time.

Not a Conspiracy, a Network

Interconnected spiritual communities network diagram in nature

What Organizational Behaviour Tells Us About Rainbow, Bhakti, KN¿WHERE and Raven’s Knoll

Over the last several posts, we have been looking at something that at first appeared to be a fairly simple question: who knows whom?

We looked at the Rainbow Family. We looked at Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss. We looked at performers, facilitators and organizers who appear around those communities. We then started comparing those names with KN¿WHERE and the wider network of events that have appeared at Raven’s Knoll.

What has emerged does not justify claiming that all of these groups are secretly one organization. The evidence we have examined does not establish that.

What it does suggest is something both more ordinary and, from an organizational behaviour perspective, more interesting.

We appear to be looking at an interconnected social ecosystem.

Organizations Do Not Need Organizational Charts

One of the first lessons of organizational behaviour is that formal organizational structure is only part of the story.

A business might have managers, departments, policies and reporting relationships. But alongside that formal structure exists an informal organization built through friendships, reputation, influence, shared experiences and personal relationships.

The same principle can be applied to communities that deliberately avoid conventional hierarchy.

The Rainbow Family, for example, has historically emphasized decentralization and the absence of conventional membership or centralized leadership. That does not mean organizational behaviour disappears.

Whenever people interact repeatedly, behavioural norms develop.

Certain people become trusted.

Certain people become influential.

People learn who knows how to organize something, who knows performers, who has access to land, who has equipment, who has experience running gatherings and who can connect one group of people with another.

This is what organizational behaviour calls an informal organization.

It can exist without titles, membership cards or an organizational chart.

Culture Travels Through People

This becomes important when looking at Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss.

Finding people who have participated in both Rainbow-associated communities and Bhakti events does not demonstrate that one organization controls the other.

People carry culture with them.

They carry language.

They carry rituals.

They carry music.

They carry organizational habits.

They carry ideas about community, leadership, spirituality, cooperation and conflict.

When people move between communities, pieces of those cultures can move with them.

Organizational behaviour describes this through concepts such as organizational culture, socialization and communities of practice.

A person does not need instructions from Organization A before bringing something they learned there into Community B.

Sometimes cultural transmission happens simply because people participate in both environments.

That gives us an important rule for interpreting what we have found:

Connection is not control.

Two communities sharing a performer, facilitator or organizer establishes a relationship between people. It does not automatically establish a command relationship between organizations.

The People Between the Communities

This is where our investigation became particularly interesting.

We began asking whether Eric Mandala represented the primary bridge between Rainbow-associated networks and the Bhakti community, or whether other people could also be identified moving through those spaces.

We then started checking additional recurring names and asking whether some of those people also appeared around KN¿WHERE.

In organizational behaviour and social network analysis, people occupying these positions are often described as boundary spanners.

A boundary spanner connects communities that might otherwise remain relatively separate.

They may introduce people.

They may recommend performers.

They may bring organizers together.

They may transfer information.

They may introduce new practices or ideas.

They may simply appear repeatedly in several communities and become a trusted connection between them.

The distinction matters.

If only one person connects two otherwise separate communities, the network might look something like this:

Community A → Individual → Community B

But when several people independently appear in both communities, something different begins to emerge:

Community A ⇄ overlapping social network ⇄ Community B

That still does not prove centralized coordination.

It indicates something much more familiar: a shared social network.

People Know People

This may sound almost too simple, but it explains a remarkable amount of organizational behaviour.

People know people.

Organizers reuse performers they trust.

Performers recommend other performers.

Volunteers become organizers.

Participants attend another festival.

Someone meets someone around a campfire and gets invited to another event six months later.

Relationships accumulate.

Eventually several apparently separate events can occupy the same broader social ecosystem without belonging to the same organization.

Homophily: Why These Communities May Naturally Overlap

There is another useful concept here: homophily.

Homophily describes the tendency of people with similar interests, beliefs, lifestyles or identities to associate with one another.

Consider the possible progression:

Someone interested in alternative spirituality may become interested in community gatherings.

That person may attend ecstatic dance or devotional music events.

They may become involved in camping festivals.

They may know people interested in environmentalism, Paganism, yoga, transformational festivals, Rainbow gatherings or electronic music.

None of those connections necessarily requires an organizing authority.

The network grows because people sharing similar interests repeatedly encounter one another.

This is one reason we need to be cautious when investigating overlapping communities.

Network overlap is evidence of relationships. It is not, by itself, evidence of centralized coordination.

Then Raven’s Knoll Enters the Picture

This brings us back to Raven’s Knoll.

Much of our earlier discussion focused on Raven’s Knoll as a Pagan space and on the apparent tension between that historical identity and the increasingly varied collection of events taking place there.

But organizational behaviour gives us another way of looking at the situation.

Instead of asking only:

Why did Raven’s Knoll host KN¿WHERE?

we can ask:

How did Raven’s Knoll’s organizational culture and social network evolve until hosting an event such as KN¿WHERE became possible?

That is a very different question.

It shifts our attention away from searching for one decision or one person responsible for everything and instead asks how organizational change happens over time.

Organizational Change Rarely Happens All at Once

Organizational Behaviour gives us several models for understanding change.

One of the oldest is Kurt Lewin’s three-stage model:

Unfreeze → Change → Refreeze

An existing organizational culture first becomes loosened. New behaviours, relationships or practices are introduced. Eventually a new cultural equilibrium develops.

When looking at Raven’s Knoll, however, there is another possibility worth considering.

Perhaps there has never been a complete refreezing.

The identity may instead have remained increasingly fluid.

Conceptually, the progression might look something like:

Pagan sacred space → Pagan campground → broader community gathering space → diversified festival venue.

Those categories are not necessarily mutually exclusive, nor does this simple progression prove when or why any particular change occurred.

But it illustrates the organizational tension we have repeatedly encountered.

Long-term participants can continue to understand a place according to an earlier organizational identity while those responsible for operating the property gradually develop a broader understanding of what the organization has become.

That Creates Organizational Identity Conflict

This is where the Raven’s Knoll story becomes much larger than one festival.

Organizational identity answers a deceptively simple question:

Who are we?

When members, leaders and stakeholders have different answers to that question, conflict becomes almost inevitable.

One person may understand Raven’s Knoll primarily as Pagan sacred land.

Another may understand it as a festival campground.

Another may understand it as privately owned property available for diverse community events.

Another may see all three descriptions as compatible.

The organizational problem arises when people believe they share the same definition but actually do not.

Formal Ownership and Psychological Ownership Are Different

There is another OB concept underneath some of this conflict: psychological ownership.

People can develop an intense sense that a community, organization or place is partly “theirs” even when they have no legal ownership of it.

They may have volunteered there.

Built things there.

Performed rituals there.

Created friendships there.

Returned year after year.

Buried memories there.

Eventually the distinction between the place belongs to someone and I belong to this place becomes emotionally significant.

When the direction of the property changes, those people may therefore experience more than disagreement.

They may experience a perceived loss of organizational identity and belonging.

That does not give them legal authority over the property.

But it helps explain why organizational changes involving community spaces can generate disproportionately strong emotional responses.

A Better Way to Understand What We Found

After looking at the Rainbow Family, Bhakti in the Woods, Bhakti Bliss, KN¿WHERE and Raven’s Knoll, I do not believe the responsible conclusion is:

These are all secretly the same organization.

We have not established that.

A much stronger and more defensible conclusion is:

These communities appear to participate, to varying degrees, in an overlapping social ecosystem through which performers, facilitators, organizers, participants, relationships and cultural practices can move.

That distinction is important.

The Organizational Behaviour Behind It

Several OB concepts now appear repeatedly throughout this story.

Informal organization: Influence and coordination can exist without formal titles or hierarchy.

Organizational culture: Communities develop shared values, rituals, language and behavioural expectations.

Social identity: People develop part of their personal identity through membership or participation in communities.

Boundary spanning: Certain individuals connect otherwise separate groups.

Social networks: Information, resources and people move through relationships rather than organizational charts.

Referent power: People can influence others because they are respected, charismatic or trusted rather than because they possess formal authority.

Normative influence: People learn how to behave by observing what their community considers normal.

Homophily: People with similar values and interests naturally form interconnected networks.

Organizational identity: Conflict develops when stakeholders disagree about what an organization fundamentally represents.

Organizational change: Communities evolve through accumulated decisions and relationships rather than necessarily through a single dramatic event.

What KN¿WHERE May Actually Represent

Looked at this way, KN¿WHERE may be less important as an isolated incident than as an organizational symptom.

It tells us something about what Raven’s Knoll had become capable of hosting.

That does not automatically tell us whether that change was good, bad, intentional or accidental.

Those are separate questions.

But from an organizational behaviour perspective, an event rarely appears inside an organizational environment completely disconnected from everything that came before it.

Relationships had to exist.

Someone had to know someone.

Someone had to believe the event fit the property.

Someone had to possess enough influence or authority to make it possible.

That is organizational behaviour.

The More Interesting Question

Perhaps we have been asking the wrong question.

The question is not simply:

Who brought KN¿WHERE to Raven’s Knoll?

The more useful question may be:

What changes in Raven’s Knoll’s culture, relationships, stakeholder network and organizational identity made KN¿WHERE a reasonable possibility in the first place?

That is where the Rainbow, Bhakti and KN¿WHERE research becomes relevant.

Not because it reveals some hidden master organization.

Because it begins showing us the network.

And organizations, communities and cultures are ultimately built from networks of people.

The organizational chart, when one exists at all, only tells part of the story.

The relationships tell us the rest.

And that may be the most useful finding to come out of this investigation so far.

Following the Threads: Rainbow Family, Bhakti Bliss, KN¿WHERE and Raven’s Knoll

Network map of global festival communities and their interconnected events by theme and location

Over the last several posts, I have been following what initially looked like a fairly simple question:

Is there a connection between Bhakti Bliss and the Rainbow Family?

There is.

But after following the people rather than simply the names of the organizations, the story became considerably larger.

What emerged was not evidence of one secret organization running everything.

Instead, what emerged was an interconnected Ottawa-Gatineau alternative-spirituality, wellness, music and festival network whose participants appear repeatedly at Bhakti events, Rainbow Family gatherings, ecstatic dances, yoga festivals, wellness events, GAIAFEST, Raven’s Knoll and, at least in some cases, KN¿WHERE.

That distinction matters.

This isn’t a conspiracy chart.

It is a social-network chart.

And those are two very different things.

Let’s Go Back to the Beginning

The first piece of the puzzle is the Rainbow Family of Living Light.

The Rainbow Family is an intentionally decentralized countercultural community associated with Rainbow Gatherings. There is no conventional membership system, president or central organization.

Ontario has its own Rainbow Family community.

While looking through publicly indexed Ontario Rainbow Family material, one name appeared repeatedly:

Eric Mandala.

Eric does not merely use the word “Rainbow” in the name of his musical project.

Public Ontario Rainbow Family discussions place him directly within that community. One discussion about possible Ontario gathering sites specifically names Eric Mandala, while another gathering discussion posted by Eric refers participants to either JF or Zu Zen regarding communal supplies and says Zu would inventory those supplies.

So Eric’s connection with Ontario Rainbow culture is not simply an inference based upon the name of his band.

Then Eric appeared somewhere else.

Bhakti Bliss.

Eric Mandala and Bhakti Bliss

Eric has appeared repeatedly in the Bhakti Bliss community.

He performed at Bhakti Bliss in previous years and returned to Raven’s Knoll for the August 7–9, 2026 festival. Bhakti Bliss publicly promoted his 2026 appearance directly.

At first, that left us with a fairly simple connection:

Ontario Rainbow Family

Eric Mandala

Bhakti Bliss

That could easily have been nothing more than a musician belonging to several communities.

Then we started looking at the other people.

Zu Zen Changes the Picture

Zu Zen appears both in Eric Mandala’s musical community and in Ontario Rainbow Family gathering activity.

The Ontario Rainbow Family material dealing with communal equipment specifically names Eric Mandala and Zu Zen and gives Zu a practical role involving the inventory of gathering supplies.

That meant Eric was no longer necessarily the only bridge.

And once we started following the wider group of musicians and facilitators around Eric, another festival repeatedly appeared.

GAIAFEST.

GAIAFEST May Be the Missing Middle Layer

This may be one of the most useful discoveries in the entire investigation.

GAIAFEST brought together numerous people who subsequently appear elsewhere in this network.

Public GAIAFEST material identifies Eric Mandala as a repeat participant and shows Rebecca White Raven and JS McPherson within the festival’s programming.

Other archived GAIAFEST material places Nick Gallarza and Andrew Sass within the GAIAFEST environment as well.

That is significant because these connections existed independently of KN¿WHERE being held at Raven’s Knoll.

In other words, Raven’s Knoll did not create this social network.

The network already existed.

That changes the question considerably.

Now Go Back Further: Bhakti in the Woods

Bhakti Bliss itself also has a history.

Before Bhakti Bliss there was Bhakti in the Woods.

Public biographical material concerning Rebecca White Raven states that she helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and that, after that festival ended its approximately ten-year run, Rebecca initiated Bhakti Bliss.

That gives us direct continuity:

Bhakti in the Woods

Rebecca White Raven

Bhakti Bliss

Rebecca continues to be deeply involved.

The current Bhakti Bliss committee material identifies:

Rebecca — Lead
Bob — Finance Coordinator
Courtney — Program Coordinator
Andrew — Ticket Coordinator

And that mysterious “Andrew” sent us down another rabbit hole.

Andrew Appears to Be Andrew Sass

The committee graphic itself unfortunately identifies its Ticket Coordinator only as “Andrew.”

However, there are strong reasons to conclude that this is Andrew Sass.

Andrew Sass is not a casual visitor to Bhakti Bliss.

He has appeared repeatedly as a yoga instructor, musician and workshop facilitator. Bhakti Bliss describes him as a significant support within its community.

At Bhakti Bliss 2023 he led a Song Writing Circle.

He also participated in the December 2025 twelve-hour Bhakti Bliss chant-a-thon fundraiser specifically raising money for the 2026 festival.

Current Bhakti Bliss material again promotes Andrew Sass as returning to the festival’s kirtan programming.

Taken together with the committee indexing, I consider the identification of the committee’s “Andrew” as Andrew Sass to be high confidence.

But because the actual committee graphic does not print his surname, I would still describe it that way rather than pretending the image says something it doesn’t.

That’s an important research habit:

Strong evidence isn’t the same thing as absolute evidence.

Then We Found Nick Gallarza

This is where the Bhakti and KN¿WHERE worlds begin making a documented personnel connection.

Nick Gallarza publicly announced his participation in KN¿WHERE and appears in indexed promotional material associated with the Raven’s Knoll festival.

KN¿WHERE itself describes the June 5–7, 2026 Raven’s Knoll festival as an overnight event combining music, art and wellness. During the day, participants could attend wellness workshops and art and production classes before the bass-music stages operated at night.

Then Nick turns up again.

This time at Bhakti Bliss 2026.

Bhakti Bliss promoted Nick Gallarza as the facilitator of a workshop called Enlightenment Through Communication.

So this particular connection is no longer theoretical:

KN¿WHERE

Nick Gallarza

Bhakti Bliss

That is a genuine shared-personnel connection between the two festival environments.

It does not establish that the festivals have the same organizers.

But it does establish that the communities are not completely isolated from one another.

And Nick Already Knew This Community

This is where GAIAFEST becomes important again.

Nick Gallarza and Andrew Sass appear within the same broader GAIAFEST network that also contains Eric Mandala, Rebecca White Raven and JS McPherson.

Therefore, the connection is not simply:

Nick attended KN¿WHERE and later happened to attend Bhakti Bliss.

Instead, Nick appears within an already-existing alternative festival and wellness network containing several people connected with Bhakti Bliss.

This pushes the timeline backward.

The cross-pollination predates KN¿WHERE’s arrival at Raven’s Knoll.

The Network Now Looks Something Like This

Ontario Rainbow Family

Eric Mandala / Zu Zen

Rainbow Tribe / ecstatic dance / alternative music community

GAIAFEST and Ottawa-Gatineau wellness-festival community
↙︎            ↘︎
Rebecca White Raven Andrew Sass / Nick Gallarza / JS McPherson / others
↓             ↓
Bhakti in the Woods  shared festival community
↓             ↓
Bhakti Bliss ←──────────→ KN¿WHERE personnel overlap
↓             ↓
Raven’s Knoll ←────────→ Raven’s Knoll

That diagram isn’t meant to say that everybody belongs to the Rainbow Family.

They don’t necessarily.

Nor does it say that everybody organizes every event.

They clearly don’t.

It demonstrates that these communities have multiple social bridges.

Rainbow Tribe Does Not Equal Rainbow Family

This point needs repeating because it would be very easy to get sloppy here.

Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe is a musical project.

The Rainbow Family of Living Light is the decentralized countercultural community associated with Rainbow Gatherings.

Eric’s participation in both creates a connection.

Zu Zen’s documented participation in Ontario Rainbow gathering logistics creates another connection.

But someone appearing on a Rainbow Tribe recording does not automatically make that individual a member of the Rainbow Family.

Nor does performing with Eric establish Rainbow Family membership.

Association tells us where to look.

It doesn’t automatically tell us what we will find.

Bhakti Bliss Is Also Its Own Organization

This needs to remain clear as well.

Bhakti Bliss publicly describes itself as a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to promote unity and holistic well-being through Bhakti Yoga. Its festival includes yoga, workshops, music, kirtan and community activities.

I have found no credible evidence that the Rainbow Family owns Bhakti Bliss.

I have found no credible evidence that the Rainbow Family controls Bhakti Bliss.

And I have found no credible evidence that Bhakti Bliss should simply be called a Rainbow Gathering under another name.

What we have found is significant social-network overlap.

That’s a very different conclusion.

KN¿WHERE Is Also Its Own Organization

The same principle applies to KN¿WHERE.

KN¿WHERE describes itself as the evolution of DNR’s Toronto KN¿WHERE events and as an arts, music and wellness festival centred primarily around bass music. Its 2026 camping edition took place at Raven’s Knoll from June 5–7.

I have found no evidence establishing that KN¿WHERE is a Rainbow Family event.

I have found no evidence that Eric Mandala or the Ontario Rainbow Family operates DNR.

And I have found no evidence that Bhakti Bliss operates KN¿WHERE.

What we now know is that at least some of the people appearing in these festival ecosystems overlap.

Nick Gallarza is the clearest documented example so far.

And Raven’s Knoll Becomes the Convergence Point

This is where Raven’s Knoll becomes fascinating.

KN¿WHERE describes Raven’s Knoll as its 2026 venue.

Bhakti Bliss also takes place there.

But Raven’s Knoll historically developed within Ontario Pagan festival culture.

So on the same property we now have communities associated with:

Paganism.

Heathenry.

Bhakti Yoga.

Kirtan.

Ecstatic dance.

Sound healing.

Wellness culture.

Electronic dance music.

Camping festival culture.

And through some of the people involved, connections into the broader Rainbow community.

This does not mean Raven’s Knoll created these relationships.

In fact, one of our most important findings is precisely the opposite.

Many of these relationships existed before KN¿WHERE arrived at Raven’s Knoll.

GAIAFEST and the Ottawa-Gatineau alternative-spirituality community demonstrate that.

So What Is Actually Happening?

I think the simplest explanation is also the most interesting.

We are looking at an ecosystem.

Ontario’s Pagan community is relatively small.

The Rainbow community is relatively small.

Ottawa’s kirtan community is relatively small.

The ecstatic-dance community is relatively small.

The transformational and wellness-festival community is relatively small.

The underground rave community is relatively small.

Those communities are not hermetically sealed.

People move.

A musician can play kirtan one weekend and ecstatic dance another.

A yoga instructor can appear at GAIAFEST and Bhakti Bliss.

A photographer, artist or facilitator can participate in a wellness festival and later appear at a rave.

A Rainbow participant can perform at a Pagan festival.

A Pagan campground can host a Bhakti festival and then a bass-music festival.

Over enough time, the networks inevitably begin crossing.

The Language Crosses Too

There is another interesting similarity.

Listen to the recurring vocabulary:

Community.

Connection.

Unity.

Transformation.

Movement.

Wellness.

Nature.

Family.

Healing.

Love.

KN¿WHERE itself describes the Raven’s Knoll event as an immersive experience combining music, art and wellness and speaks about connecting with yourself and the community.

Bhakti Bliss says its mission is to kindle unity and holistic well-being and create a vibrant community through Bhakti Yoga.

Different traditions.

Different music.

Different organizations.

But overlapping cultural vocabulary.

That Doesn’t Mean They Are All the Same Thing

This may be the most important conclusion from the entire exercise.

Shared vocabulary does not prove shared control.

Shared performers do not prove shared ownership.

A shared venue does not prove organizational affiliation.

A person attending a Rainbow Gathering does not make every event they subsequently attend a Rainbow event.

And somebody knowing Eric Mandala does not make that person a member of the Rainbow Family.

We have to resist turning a network into an organization simply because drawing lines between people makes a complicated picture.

What About the Government “Watch List” Question?

We looked at that as well.

The Rainbow Family has certainly attracted government and law-enforcement attention, particularly because large unauthorized Rainbow Gatherings create significant land-management, safety and permit issues.

That is not the same thing as proving that the Rainbow Family is formally designated as a terrorist organization.

We were unable to substantiate the claim that the Rainbow Family itself is formally listed as a terrorist organization in Canada or the United States.

That distinction follows exactly the same research principle:

Monitoring is not designation.

Association is not membership.

Overlap is not control.

What We Can Now Say With Confidence

After following these threads, I think the evidence supports the following conclusions:

1. Bhakti Bliss grew directly out of Bhakti in the Woods.

Rebecca White Raven helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and subsequently initiated Bhakti Bliss when the earlier festival ended.

2. Eric Mandala has genuine connections to both Ontario Rainbow culture and Bhakti Bliss.

His Rainbow connection is independently visible in Ontario Rainbow Family material, and his Bhakti Bliss participation is documented by the festival itself.

3. Eric is not the only bridge.

Zu Zen appears within Ontario Rainbow gathering logistics as well as Eric’s broader community.

4. GAIAFEST demonstrates that much of this alternative-festival network existed independently of Raven’s Knoll.

Eric Mandala, Rebecca White Raven, JS McPherson and others appear within that environment, with Nick Gallarza and Andrew Sass appearing in the wider GAIAFEST network as well.

5. Nick Gallarza creates a documented personnel bridge between KN¿WHERE and Bhakti Bliss.

He appears in KN¿WHERE promotional material and is a 2026 Bhakti Bliss workshop facilitator.

6. Andrew Sass appears to be part of the Bhakti Bliss organizational core, not merely a booked musician.

The committee identifies an “Andrew” as Ticket Coordinator, while Andrew Sass has years of documented Bhakti Bliss participation and fundraising involvement. The identification is strong, although the committee graphic itself does not provide the surname.

7. KN¿WHERE and Bhakti Bliss remain separate organizations.

KN¿WHERE publicly presents itself as an arts, music and wellness festival evolving from DNR’s KN¿WHERE events, while Bhakti Bliss describes itself as its own not-for-profit Bhakti Yoga organization.

8. Raven’s Knoll is the present physical convergence point, but it did not create the underlying network.

The people and relationships can be traced through earlier festivals and community events.

What We Cannot Say

And just as importantly:

We cannot presently say that Bhakti Bliss is operated by the Rainbow Family.

We cannot say that KN¿WHERE is operated by the Rainbow Family.

We cannot say that DNR Productions is a Rainbow organization.

We cannot say that every Rainbow Tribe musician belongs to the Rainbow Family.

We cannot say that everyone appearing at GAIAFEST belongs to the same spiritual movement.

And we cannot say that merely appearing at Raven’s Knoll makes any person part of Raven’s Knoll’s Pagan community.

Those claims would go beyond the evidence.

The Bigger Story

When I started looking at this, I thought I was investigating whether one festival had connections to the Rainbow Family.

I don’t think that is the most interesting question anymore.

The bigger story is how modern alternative communities actually function.

Not as isolated boxes.

As overlapping networks.

Bhakti.

Paganism.

Rainbow culture.

Yoga.

Kirtan.

Ecstatic dance.

Wellness culture.

Transformational festivals.

Electronic music.

Rave culture.

They do not become the same thing simply because people move between them.

But the people moving between them carry ideas, practices, friendships and cultural expectations along with them.

That is how communities influence one another.

Not necessarily because somebody at the top planned it.

Sometimes there isn’t anybody at the top.

Sometimes it is simply what happens when the same hundred or thousand people keep meeting each other at festivals, workshops, dances, gatherings and campfires for twenty years.

And that brings us back to Raven’s Knoll.

Perhaps the question we should continue asking isn’t:

“Who secretly controls all of this?”

There is currently no evidence suggesting that anybody does.

A much more useful question is:

“What happens when all of these communities begin sharing the same people, ideas and spaces?”

That question we actually have evidence to explore.

And I suspect we are nowhere near finished following those threads.

References

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2026). Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival: Official festival and program materials.

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2026). Meet the Bhakti Bliss Committee [Social media post].

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2026). Enlightenment Through Communication with Nick Gallarza [Social media post].

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2025). Bhakti Bliss chant-a-thon fundraiser. Ticket Tailor.

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2023). Bhakti Bliss 2023. Ticket Tailor.

GAIAFEST. (2024–2026). Artist, facilitator and festival promotional materials.

KN¿WHERE Music Festival. (2026). About KN¿WHERE Music Festival.

KN¿WHERE Music Festival. (2026). KN¿WHERE Music Festival.

Ontario Rainbow Family. (2019–2026). Public gathering discussions and community posts.

Bhakti in the Woods, Bhakti Bliss and the Rainbow Family: Following the Connections

Outdoor spiritual festival with yoga and music stage

Sometimes researching alternative spiritual communities feels less like drawing a family tree and more like untangling a spiderweb.

You start with one festival.

A familiar name appears.

That name leads to another event.

Another musician appears.

Then you discover that several of the same people have been creating music, ceremonies, retreats and gatherings together for years.

That is essentially what happened while I was looking into Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival.

One of the names that caught my attention was Eric Mandala.

Eric has connections to the Ontario Rainbow Family and also leads a musical project called Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe. He has also repeatedly appeared at Bhakti Bliss.

That produced an obvious question:

Is Bhakti Bliss connected to the Rainbow Family?

The answer turns out to be more interesting than either a simple yes or a simple no.

There are connections.

There are several of them.

But we need to be very precise about what those connections actually establish.

Before Bhakti Bliss, There Was Bhakti in the Woods

Bhakti Bliss did not simply appear from nowhere.

Its predecessor was Bhakti in the Woods Yoga & Music Festival, an Ottawa-area festival that ran for approximately ten years. Rebecca White Raven, who was involved in organizing Bhakti in the Woods, later initiated Bhakti Bliss after the older festival ended. A current biography for Rebecca describes Bhakti Bliss as the not-for-profit organization that followed the end of Bhakti in the Woods’ ten-year run.

This establishes something important immediately:

There is direct community continuity between Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss.

They should not be treated as two completely unrelated festivals that happened to have similar names.

We can also get a reasonably good picture of what Bhakti in the Woods was trying to create.

A description of the 2019 festival called it a gathering dedicated to wholeness, sacred sound, healing, community, sustainability and what it termed the “New Earth.” Programming included chants, healing songs and other spiritual and wellness activities intended to create a sense of community and connection with the natural world.

An earlier fundraiser for the 2018 festival went even further in describing its organizational character. Bhakti in the Woods called itself a small, grassroots, non-corporate festival and emphasized community, sound healing, networking with local businesses and yoga organizations, and artists supporting one another.

If you have spent time around Pagan festivals, Rainbow Gatherings, transformational festivals or other alternative spiritual communities, much of that language probably sounds familiar.

That similarity by itself proves absolutely nothing.

But it provides the cultural environment in which the later personal connections make considerably more sense.

Rebecca White Raven Is the Continuity Point

Rebecca is particularly important to understanding this story.

She wasn’t simply somebody who performed at both festivals.

Her biography states that she helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and subsequently initiated Bhakti Bliss when the earlier festival ended.

Rebecca has also been heavily involved in Ottawa’s broader alternative-spirituality scene, organizing chanting, sound healing and ecstatic-dance events.

And this is where our network begins to expand.

Archived social-media material places Rebecca White Raven, Eric Mandala, Kazandra Schellenger and Zu Zen together as hosts of events within that same Ottawa spiritual and musical community.

That is important.

We are no longer looking at:

Bhakti Bliss hires Eric Mandala to perform.

Instead, we can see that some of these relationships predate Bhakti Bliss itself.

Rebecca, Eric and Zu were already operating within overlapping musical and spiritual circles while Rebecca was associated with Bhakti in the Woods.

Enter Eric Mandala

Eric Mandala is probably the most visible connection because his Rainbow associations are unusually easy to document.

Public Ontario Rainbow Family material identifies Eric Mandala in that community, including an older Ontario Rainbow Family post where he is identified as an administrator while discussing plans for a Canadian Rainbow gathering.

The Ontario Rainbow Family’s public material also carries posts promoting music by Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe.

Eric’s Rainbow Tribe project is itself extensively documented.

The 2021 album Warriors of Light Unite is credited to Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe. Its collaborators include Zu Zen, JS “Snowlion” McPherson, Geneviève Grenier and several others. Eric’s own description of the project repeatedly emphasizes unity, peace, collective consciousness and the idea of humanity as one family.

Eric has meanwhile become a recurring Bhakti Bliss performer.

He appeared on the official 2025 Bhakti Bliss lineup, where he was presented as an ecstatic-dance music producer, composer and multi-instrumentalist.

And as of this weekend, August 7–9, 2026, Bhakti Bliss is again promoting Eric Mandala, this time for a kirtan performance built around sacred mantra, music and communal singing.

So Eric’s presence at Bhakti Bliss isn’t a single historical appearance.

It is recurring.

But “The Rainbow Tribe” and “The Rainbow Family” Are Not Automatically the Same Thing

This is where we have to resist an extremely tempting shortcut.

Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe is a musical project.

The Rainbow Family of Living Light is a decentralized countercultural community associated with Rainbow Gatherings.

Those names overlap.

Eric himself overlaps.

Some people around him overlap.

But we cannot simply take everybody credited on a Rainbow Tribe recording and declare that person a member of the Rainbow Family.

That would be guilt by association dressed up as research.

For example, Eric’s recordings document recurring collaborators including Zu Zen, JS McPherson, Kristina Mira, Geneviève Grenier and others.

That proves that they participate in Eric’s musical network.

It does not automatically prove their participation in Rainbow Gatherings.

Those are different propositions and need different evidence.

Zu Zen Is Another Interesting Node

Zu Zen deserves attention because she appears repeatedly across the different networks we are examining.

She appears alongside Rebecca and Eric in older Ottawa event material.

She is one of the musicians credited on Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe’s Warriors of Light Unite.

Her name also appears repeatedly in publicly indexed Ontario Rainbow Family discussions involving gathering locations and community activity.

Again, I want to be precise.

A Facebook search result is not a membership certificate, particularly when discussing a community such as the Rainbow Family that doesn’t really issue membership certificates in the first place.

What it does show is that Eric isn’t the only person whose social network crosses these spaces.

The Network Begins Looking Different

If Eric had appeared once at Bhakti Bliss, the reasonable explanation would be very simple:

A festival hired a musician who happens to have Rainbow Family connections.

Nothing particularly interesting about that.

But that isn’t quite what we have.

Instead, the documented network looks something like this:

Bhakti in the Woods

Rebecca White Raven helps organize the festival

Rebecca is part of a wider Ottawa chanting, ecstatic-dance and spiritual-music community

Rebecca appears in events alongside Eric Mandala and Zu Zen

Eric has a documented Ontario Rainbow Family presence

Eric creates Eric Mandala & The Rainbow Tribe with collaborators including Zu Zen and JS McPherson

Bhakti in the Woods ends after approximately ten years

Rebecca initiates Bhakti Bliss

Eric becomes a recurring Bhakti Bliss performer

That is considerably more substantial than one performer appearing on one festival poster.

Then Bhakti Bliss Moves to Raven’s Knoll

There is yet another layer to the story.

Bhakti Bliss is currently held at Raven’s Knoll near Eganville, Ontario.

The festival’s official material identifies Raven’s Knoll as the location for its August 7–9, 2026 gathering and advertises yoga, workshops, live music, kirtan, sacred sound, meditation, breathwork, dance, vendors and communal bonfires.

That obviously makes Bhakti Bliss particularly interesting to those of us who already follow Ontario Pagan festival culture.

But here again:

Venue is not ownership.

A festival occurring at Raven’s Knoll does not mean Raven’s Knoll created it.

Likewise, performers with Rainbow Family connections appearing at Bhakti Bliss do not mean the Rainbow Family controls it.

Those distinctions become important very quickly when small alternative-spirituality communities overlap as heavily as these ones do.

What Bhakti Bliss Says It Is

Bhakti Bliss describes itself as a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to promote unity and holistic well-being through the practice of Bhakti Yoga. Its festival centres around yoga, workshops, music, kirtan and community activities.

I have found no reliable public evidence showing that the Ontario Rainbow Family owns Bhakti Bliss, operates Bhakti Bliss, controls its committee or determines its programming.

That is an important negative finding.

If somebody asks:

“Is Bhakti Bliss a Rainbow Family festival?”

I don’t think the available evidence justifies answering yes.

But Is There Rainbow Family Influence?

That is a different question.

Influence is difficult to measure because ideas do not travel with ownership papers attached.

But we can talk about social-network overlap.

And there I think the evidence is much stronger.

The continuity between Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss is documented through Rebecca.

Rebecca, Eric and Zu operated within overlapping Ottawa music and spiritual circles.

Eric has documented involvement in Ontario Rainbow Family spaces.

Eric’s Rainbow Tribe project includes several musicians from that broader alternative-spirituality scene.

And Eric continues to be featured by Bhakti Bliss.

That is enough for me to say:

Bhakti Bliss exists within a broader spiritual and musical community that significantly overlaps with people and networks associated with Ontario Rainbow culture.

That is different from saying:

Bhakti Bliss is operated by the Rainbow Family.

I currently cannot substantiate the second statement.

Why Does This Overlap Exist?

I don’t think we need a conspiracy theory to explain it.

These communities naturally occupy similar cultural territory.

Bhakti in the Woods described itself using ideas of sacred sound, healing, sustainability, community and creating a new way of relating to one another and the Earth.

Eric’s Rainbow Tribe material talks about unity, peace, spiritual transformation, environmental and social consciousness and humanity becoming one family.

Bhakti Bliss currently promotes devotion, yoga, communal singing, meditation, movement, dance and community connection.

These aren’t identical spiritual systems.

But they provide plenty of common ground.

Musicians move between them.

Workshop facilitators move between them.

People attend several different festivals.

Friendships develop.

One community’s performer becomes another community’s organizer.

Someone who meets people at a Rainbow Gathering may later see them at ecstatic dance, kirtan, a Pagan festival or a yoga gathering.

In relatively small alternative-spirituality communities, that isn’t unusual.

And This Is Why Association Needs to Be Handled Carefully

There is another reason I wanted to write this article.

It demonstrates how easily research can go wrong.

We could find Eric Mandala at Bhakti Bliss.

We could find Eric in Ontario Rainbow Family material.

We could find the words “Rainbow Tribe.”

Then we could announce:

“Aha! Bhakti Bliss is Rainbow Family.”

Except we haven’t actually proved that.

What we have proved is much more nuanced and, frankly, more interesting.

We have found a network.

People.

Relationships.

Shared events.

Shared musicians.

Shared vocabulary.

Shared spiritual interests.

And continuity between one festival and another.

Networks matter.

But networks are not automatically organizations.

So What Can We Actually Say?

Based on the public evidence I have been able to locate, I think these statements are supportable:

Bhakti in the Woods and Bhakti Bliss are directly connected. Rebecca White Raven helped organize Bhakti in the Woods and subsequently initiated Bhakti Bliss after the former ended its approximately ten-year run.

Eric Mandala is not merely an isolated performer who appeared once. He is a recurring Bhakti Bliss participant and has established relationships with people in the wider community around its predecessor.

Eric has a documented relationship with the Ontario Rainbow Family. Publicly indexed Ontario Rainbow Family material identifies him as an administrator and shows his participation in gathering discussions and promotion of Rainbow Tribe projects.

Eric is not the only overlapping social node. Zu Zen appears in the older Rebecca/Eric community, Eric’s Rainbow Tribe music, and Ontario Rainbow Family material.

There is therefore meaningful social overlap between these communities.

But:

I have not found evidence establishing that Bhakti Bliss is owned, operated or controlled by the Rainbow Family.

And until such evidence appears, I don’t think we should say that it is.

The More Interesting Story Is the Ecosystem

Perhaps the mistake is trying to put hard organizational borders around communities that do not behave that way.

The alternative-spirituality world often operates through relationships rather than institutions.

Someone teaches yoga here.

Plays violin there.

Attends a Rainbow Gathering.

Performs at a Pagan festival.

Hosts ecstatic dance in Ottawa.

Leads kirtan somewhere else.

Then appears at another festival five years later.

Follow those relationships long enough and what emerges isn’t necessarily a secret organization.

It is an ecosystem.

Bhakti in the Woods was part of that ecosystem.

Bhakti Bliss appears to remain part of it.

Ontario Rainbow Family is another part of it.

Eric Mandala and his collaborators move through several parts of it.

And now Bhakti Bliss happens at Raven’s Knoll, placing yet another alternative-spirituality community within the same physical landscape.

That, to me, is the story worth watching.

Not because overlapping communities are inherently sinister.

They aren’t.

But because understanding the relationships between communities helps us understand how ideas, practices, people and influence actually move through modern Pagan and alternative-spirituality culture.

Sometimes the lines are organizational.

Sometimes they are spiritual.

Sometimes they are musical.

And sometimes they are simply friendships formed around a campfire many years ago.

The challenge is learning the difference.

References

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2025). 2025 lineup.

Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival. (2026). Bhakti Bliss Yoga & Music Festival.

Mandala, E., & The Rainbow Tribe. (2021). Warriors of Light Unite [Album]. Altar Records.

Mandala, E. (2023). You Are Perfect Just the Way You Are [Recording].

Mandala, E. (2025). May We Remember [Recording].

MountainGoat Yoga. (n.d.). Rebecca.

Ontario Rainbow Family. (2019–2026). Public community posts and gathering discussions.

Yogalaya. (2018). Chant-a-Thon: Bhakti in the Woods fundraiser.

Yogalaya. (2019). Bhakti in the Woods Yoga & Music Festival.