Leaving Home in the Spirit of Hávamál 127

Man walking on cobblestone path outside stone cottage with lit entrance at dusk

There are places we call home because they shelter us.

There are places we call home because they shaped us.

There are places we call home because part of who we became was born there, around a fire, under certain trees, beside certain people, during a season of life when the word belonging still felt simple.

But not every home remains home.

That is a hard sentence to write.

It is harder still when the place was once sacred.

Unplugged Pagan did not come to that sentence quickly. It did not come to it cleanly. It did not come to it without memory, grief, anger, gratitude, and the strange ache that comes when something that once held you no longer does.

But there comes a point where staying attached to a dead bond is no longer loyalty.

It is silence.

And Hávamál 127 has something to say about silence.

The Verse at the Door

Declaration 127 takes its name from stanza 127 of the Hávamál, commonly rendered in modern Heathen circles as:

“When you see misdeeds, speak out against them, and give your enemies no frið.”

Frith, or frið, is often understood as peace, safety, right relationship, and the bond that allows a community to exist without tearing itself apart.

That is why the line matters.

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, keep quiet for the sake of peace.”

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, preserve the appearance of harmony.”

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, maintain the old relationship at all costs because it used to mean something.”

It says to speak.

It says to name the wrong.

It says not to give frith where frith has already been broken.

That is the piece I keep circling back to.

Because the deeper lesson of Hávamál 127 is not only about enemies outside the gate. It is also about what happens when the problem is already near the hearth.

Declaration 127 and False Peace

Declaration 127 was originally written as a response to folkism and racial exclusion in modern Heathenry, especially in opposition to the Ásatrú Folk Assembly and its claims about who Heathenry was for.

That history matters. Folkism tries to turn ancestry into ownership. It tries to turn roots into border fences. It tries to turn the gods, ancestors, runes, and stories into racial property.

Declaration 127 said no.

But if Declaration 127 is only treated as an anti-folkish sticker, then we miss part of its power.

At its core, Declaration 127 also rejects the idea that silence should be maintained in the name of frith when harm is being justified through sacred language, tradition, ancestry, or community reputation.

That is where it becomes useful beyond the narrow question of folkism.

Not because every broken community is folkish.

Not because every failed home is racist.

Not because every wound is the same wound.

But because the spiritual principle is larger than the original occasion:

False peace is not frith.

That is the line.

Peace that requires silence is not frith.

Belonging that requires self-erasure is not frith.

Hospitality that protects the powerful while ignoring the wounded is not frith.

Community that remembers your labour but forgets your humanity is not frith.

Home that only remains home if you stop telling the truth is not home.

When Home Was Real

To be clear, this is not a post about pretending the old home never mattered.

It did.

That is part of what makes leaving it difficult.

There are old Unplugged Pagan writings that carry that truth plainly. The Vé remembers sacred work at Raven’s Knoll, the creation of sacred space, the carrying of poles, the marking of place, the building of something that mattered. That memory was not fake. The bond was not imagined. The sense of sacred place was real.

That matters.

If a place never mattered, leaving it would mean very little.

If a community never held meaning, there would be no grief in releasing it.

If the fire never warmed us, there would be no ache when it became ash.

So no, this is not bitterness dressed up as theology.

This is not a denial of the past.

This is not an attempt to rewrite memory so that leaving becomes easier.

The old home mattered.

That is exactly why leaving it had to be done honestly.

Roots, Hoards, and What We Refuse to Cut

Unplugged Pagan has been wrestling with roots for a long time.

Roots are not always pretty. They are hidden. Tangled. Muddy. Difficult to display. But they are what feed the tree.

In earlier reflections, I wrote about the danger of cutting off roots while expecting the branches to remain healthy. A tree can look strong from the outside while damage is already happening beneath the surface.

That image still holds.

A community can have events, names, land, symbols, buildings, programs, schedules, banners, and public language. It can still look alive from the outside.

But appearance is not health.

The roots are older than the poster.

The roots are the first fires, the old labour, the forgotten volunteers, the awkward conversations, the hands that carried wood, the people who showed up before there was applause, the ones who helped build something and later found themselves standing outside of it.

When those roots are ignored, starved, severed, or treated as disposable, something important has already gone wrong.

And when gold and silver begin to matter more than kith and kin, the hearth has shifted.

That does not mean money does not matter. Money keeps roofs standing. It pays bills. It buys tools, fuel, food, insurance, repairs, and all the practical things that keep a place functioning.

But gold and silver are not kin.

They do not sit beside you when your spirit is tired.

They do not remember the first fire.

They do not carry the old stories.

They do not make a hall sacred.

They only make it affordable.

There is a difference.

The Moment the Header Came Down

When the old Unplugged Pagan header came down, that was not just a design choice.

It was a small funeral.

The old image was taken at Raven’s Knoll. For a long time, that mattered in a good way. It carried memory. It carried place. It carried old hopes, old gatherings, old people, and an older version of Unplugged Pagan that still believed itself rooted there.

But places change.

Or more honestly, our connection to them changes.

A grove can shelter us for a season and later become somewhere we no longer belong.

A fire can warm us once and later become ash.

A home can form us and still not hold us forever.

That does not make the warmth false.

It means time moved, people changed, and the bond reached its ending.

The header had to come down because Unplugged Pagan needed its own ground.

Not borrowed ground.

Not someone else’s grove.

Not a shrine to an old connection.

Its own ground.

That was not an act of hatred.

It was an act of boundary.

And sometimes boundary is the only honest ritual left.

Leaving Is Not Always Betrayal

People often treat leaving as betrayal.

Sometimes it is.

Sometimes people abandon what they should have tended. Sometimes people walk away because repair is harder than resentment. Sometimes leaving is cowardice with cleaner shoes.

But not always.

Sometimes leaving is what happens after every inner warning has already spoken.

Sometimes leaving is what happens when the bond has died but everyone keeps asking you to behave as though it lives.

Sometimes leaving is what happens when “home” becomes a word used to keep you quiet.

Sometimes leaving is the first truthful thing a person has done in years.

That is where Hávamál 127 matters.

It gives no blessing to false peace.

It does not tell us to remain politely attached to what has already broken frith.

It does not ask us to keep handing warmth to a place that no longer shelters us.

It says misdeeds should be named.

It says enemies should not be given frith.

And sometimes the enemy is not a person.

Sometimes the enemy is the lie that a dead bond is still alive.

Not Folkism, But the Same Warning

This needs to be said carefully.

This post is not claiming that the old home was folkish.

That is not the argument.

The argument is that Declaration 127 carries a principle that reaches beyond the original fight against folkism:

Sacred language must not be used to demand silence in the face of harm.

Folkism is one form of that harm. It uses ancestry, gods, and tradition to exclude people and claim ownership over the sacred.

But there are other ways sacred language can be misused.

“Community” can be used to silence people.

“Frith” can be used to avoid accountability.

“Home” can be used to shame people for leaving.

“Kith and kin” can be used as decoration while actual bonds are neglected.

“Hospitality” can be used to protect the host while ignoring the guest.

“The good of the place” can be used to excuse the cost to the people who helped make the place good.

That is why 127 still applies.

Not as an accusation of folkism.

As a warning against false frith.

The Hearth Test

The real test of a hearth is not how it looks when the festival is full.

The real test is what happens when someone is wounded.

Who notices?

Who checks in?

Who listens?

Who protects the relationship?

Who chooses repair over reputation?

Who remembers that people are not disposable once their labour is no longer needed?

Who carries wood when no one is watching?

Who remains when the ash has to be dealt with?

That is the hearth test.

Not the banner.

Not the website language.

Not the number of people gathered around the fire.

The hearth is revealed by the treatment of the living.

If the living must become silent to preserve the image of home, then home has already failed the hearth test.

Why Unplugged Pagan Left

So why did Unplugged Pagan choose to leave home?

Because memory is not obligation.

Because gratitude is not captivity.

Because a sacred place can matter deeply and still no longer be ours.

Because roots matter, but roots are not chains.

Because frith is not maintained by pretending the wound is not there.

Because Hávamál 127 does not permit silence in the face of misdeeds.

Because Declaration 127 reminds us that keeping peace with what harms others is not peace.

Because the path does not end when one grove is left behind.

Because the land is larger than one campfire.

Because the gods are not trapped on someone else’s property.

Because the fire can be carried.

Because Unplugged Pagan needed its own ground.

The Road Behind and the Road Ahead

There is grief in this.

There should be.

Leaving home without grief usually means it was never home to begin with.

But grief is not a command to return.

Grief is the price of having once loved something honestly.

The old home shaped this path. That can be honoured.

The old fire warmed this path. That can be remembered.

The old grove held meaning. That can be spoken without shame.

But none of that requires Unplugged Pagan to keep standing under a roof that no longer shelters it.

There is a line from the Hávamál, in spirit, that cattle die, kinsmen die, and we ourselves die. What remains is reputation, deeds, and the truth of how we carried ourselves.

Places can die to us too.

Connections can die.

Communities can die.

The stories we told ourselves about belonging can die.

And when they do, the Pagan path should not require us to pretend otherwise.

Ancestor work is not dragging a corpse around.

Memory is not a leash.

Gratitude is not a prison.

Sometimes the most honest Pagan act is to stand at the edge of the old place and say:

I remember.

I honour.

I release what is no longer mine to carry.

Closing Thought

Hávamál 127 does not only belong at protests.

Declaration 127 does not only belong on organization lists.

The lesson belongs at the actual hearth.

It belongs in the difficult moment when a person has to decide whether peace is still peace, or whether peace has become silence.

For Unplugged Pagan, the answer has become clear.

Home was real.

The memory mattered.

The work mattered.

The fire mattered.

But the bond reached its ending.

And when the bond is dead, pretending it still lives is not frith.

It is false peace.

So Unplugged Pagan leaves home in the spirit of Hávamál 127.

Not with hatred.

Not with denial.

Not by pretending the old place was never sacred.

But by refusing to let sacred memory become a chain.

The road remains.

The fire can be carried.

The roots can be honoured without living under the old tree.

And sometimes the only way to keep faith with the hearth is to walk away from the hall.


Sources and Further Reading

Declaration 127, Hávamál 127, and the Actual Hearth

Inclusive Heathen ritual emphasizing frith and integrity

There is a danger in letting institutions do all of our thinking for us.

That is not a knock against institutions. Sometimes they are needed. Sometimes they hold the line when loose communities cannot. Sometimes they preserve documents, organize clergy, publish resources, and provide a public answer when the wider world asks, “Where do you stand?”

In modern Heathenry, The Troth is one of those institutions.

It gives an organizational example of inclusive Heathenry. It stands against folkism, racialism, and the use of Germanic religion as a costume for white supremacy. It now also carries formal stewardship of Declaration 127, one of the most important anti-folkish statements in modern Heathen history.

That matters.

But Unplugged Pagan is not The Troth.

Unplugged Pagan is not a clergy program, a committee, a declaration archive, or an institutional hall with bylaws and officers. It is something rougher than that. It is more like a fire at the edge of the woods, where the questions are less polished but sometimes more honest.

So the question for this place is not simply, “What does The Troth say?”

The better question is this:

What does Declaration 127 mean at the actual hearth?

The Line Between Institution and Hearth

The bigger conclusion, at least for Unplugged Pagan, is this:

The Troth gives an organizational example.

Declaration 127 gives the public boundary.

Hávamál 127 gives the old poetic command.

Unplugged Pagan asks what that means at the actual hearth.

That is the angle that matters here.

Not “The Troth says this, therefore we obey.”

That would be too institutional and too neat.

Unplugged Pagan has always been more interested in the place where the clean statement meets the dirty ground. The fire pit. The broken friendship. The old gift-bond. The kinship that failed. The boundary that had to be drawn. The guest who became a threat to the hall. The moment when keeping peace becomes complicity.

That is where Hávamál 127 stops being a quotation and becomes a test.

What Declaration 127 Is

Declaration 127 first appeared in 2016 through Huginn’s Heathen Hof. It was written as a response to the Ásatrú Folk Assembly and the wider problem of folkish rhetoric in Heathenry.

The AFA has been widely criticized because of its folkish and racialized approach to Ásatrú. The Southern Poverty Law Center describes it as a neo-Völkisch hate group, and the Anti-Defamation League describes it as a modern Norse Pagan group with a white supremacist slant.

That is the problem Declaration 127 tried to answer.

Not ancestry itself.

Not remembering the dead.

Not honouring one’s roots.

The problem is when ancestry gets turned into ownership. When roots become border fences. When honouring the ancestors becomes an excuse to lock sincere seekers out of the hall because of race, ethnicity, sexuality, gender, ability, family structure, or bloodline.

That is folkism’s poison.

It takes something sacred and turns it into a gate.

Hávamál 127

Declaration 127 takes its name from stanza 127 of the Hávamál, commonly rendered in this form:

“When you see misdeeds, speak out against them, and give your enemies no frith.”

That line has teeth.

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, quietly hope the situation improves.”

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, avoid conflict so everyone stays comfortable.”

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, keep inviting the poisoner back to the well because hospitality is sacred.”

It says to speak.

It says to name the wrong.

It says not to give frith to enemies.

That is a hard teaching, especially in Pagan spaces where many people are allergic to direct conflict. We often prefer circles, soft language, consensus, healing words, and the illusion that everyone can be included if we just stretch the tent wide enough.

But no tent can remain standing if you invite people in who are cutting the ropes.

Frith Is Not Blind Peace

Frith is often spoken of as peace, safety, right relationship, and the bonds that hold a community together.

That makes it sacred.

But sacred does not mean unlimited.

Frith is not blind peace.

Frith is not conflict avoidance.

Frith is not letting someone remain at the hearth while they deny the humanity, dignity, or belonging of others who sit there.

That is where “no frith with folkism” becomes more than a slogan.

If folkism says only certain blood belongs, then folkism has already broken frith.

If folkism says the gods are racial property, then folkism has already broken frith.

If folkism uses sacred symbols to shelter white supremacy, then folkism has already broken frith.

Refusing it a seat is not the first act of hostility.

It is the recognition that hostility was already brought through the door.

The Actual Hearth

The actual hearth is where this becomes personal.

It is easy to sign a declaration online.

It is harder to live one when the person crossing the line is someone you know.

It is harder when they once shared your fire.

It is harder when they gave you gifts.

It is harder when there is history, memory, laughter, old ritual, old loyalty, or old kinship tangled around the problem.

But that is exactly where Hávamál 127 matters most.

The real test is not whether we can denounce a stranger with a bad logo.

The real test is whether we can name misdeeds when they happen close enough to cost us something.

Unplugged Pagan has circled this fire before. Gift-bonds. Betrayal. Frith. Kinship. Hospitality. Land. Roots. The painful knowledge that some bonds die, and when they die, pretending they still live becomes its own kind of lie.

That is why this subject fits here.

Because Declaration 127 is not only about public statements and organization lists. It is about the moment when a person has to decide whether peace is still peace, or whether peace has become silence.

Remembering Roots Is Not Worshipping Blood

There is also a difference between remembering roots and worshipping blood.

That distinction matters deeply to me.

I can honour where I come from.

I can honour my ancestors.

I can honour the old stories, the land, the dead, the language fragments, the hearth practices, the gods, the spirits, the old roads, and the strange pull that brings a person back toward Pagan soil.

But ancestry is not a weapon.

Ancestry is not a deed to the gods.

Ancestry is not a lock on the hall door.

Ancestry may explain part of the road that brought me here.

It does not give me permission to lock the road behind me.

That is the sentence I keep coming back to.

Because folkism takes the memory of roots and turns it into blood worship. It takes the dead and makes them border guards. It takes heritage and turns it into spiritual property law.

I cannot accept that.

Not as Paganism.

Not as Heathenry.

Not as honour.

The Troth, Declaration 127, and Unplugged Pagan

The Troth matters here because it gives one institutional example of a different road.

It says Heathenry does not have to be folkish.

Declaration 127 matters because it gives a public boundary.

It says discriminatory organizations and exclusionary ideologies do not represent the wider Heathen community.

Hávamál 127 matters because it gives the old poetic command.

It says that when we see misdeeds, we speak against them, and we do not give enemies frith.

But Unplugged Pagan’s work is smaller and closer to the ground.

It asks what that means in the actual living of it.

What does it mean when the person at the hearth is the one poisoning the well?

What does it mean when hospitality becomes a shield for harm?

What does it mean when kinship is used to demand silence?

What does it mean when “keeping the peace” only protects the person breaking it?

Those are not institutional questions.

Those are firekeeper questions.

The Firekeeper’s Answer

A firekeeper does not only feed the flame.

A firekeeper also watches what comes near it.

Too little fuel and the fire dies.

Too much fuel and the fire becomes dangerous.

The wrong thing thrown into it can poison the air.

That is how I understand this issue.

Hospitality is sacred, yes.

But so is protection.

Kinship is sacred, yes.

But so is truth.

Ancestry is sacred, yes.

But so are deeds.

Frith is sacred, yes.

But frith cannot be built with those who deny frith to others.

That is the line at the hearth.

Not hatred.

Not purity.

Not moral performance.

A boundary.

A necessary one.

Closing Thought

The Troth can hold the archive.

Declaration 127 can mark the public boundary.

Hávamál 127 can give the old command.

But each hearth still has to decide what it will allow beside the fire.

For Unplugged Pagan, the answer is simple enough:

Remember your roots.

Honour your dead.

Keep the fire.

Welcome the sincere traveller.

But do not confuse hospitality with surrender.

Do not confuse ancestry with ownership.

Do not confuse silence with peace.

And do not give frith to those who would use the sacred to deny it to others.

The fire is lit.

The road is open.

But folkism does not get a seat by the hearth.


Sources and Further Reading

The Troth, Declaration 127, and the Line at the Hearth

Group of people socializing outdoors around a banner reading 'Open Hall, Many Roots Inclusive Heathenry All Are Welcome'

Every so often in modern Heathenry, a name comes up that is bigger than the name itself.

The Troth is one of those names.

On the surface, The Troth is an organization. It has memberships, officers, clergy training, educational programs, policies, publications, committees, and all the ordinary machinery that comes with a long-running religious body. But beneath that administrative layer is something more important: The Troth is one of the major inclusive Heathen organizations that has tried to stand against folkism, racialism, and the use of Germanic religion as cover for white supremacy.

That matters because modern Heathenry has never been free from that fight.

The gods, myths, runes, symbols, ancestors, sagas, and old Germanic language have been repeatedly grabbed by people who want to turn a spiritual path into bloodline politics. The result is a constant argument over who gets to define Heathenry: those who see it as a living religious path open to sincere seekers, or those who want to turn it into a racial gate.

The Troth stands on the inclusive side of that argument.

According to its own organizational statement, The Troth is open to people who seek to know and worship the gods, honour the ancestors, and live by Germanic Heathen values, regardless of tradition, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, ability, gender, or family structure. It also states plainly that it stands against the use of Germanic religion or symbols to advance racism, sexism, transphobia, homophobia, ableism, or white supremacy.

That is not vague language.

That is a line.

What Is The Troth?

The Troth began as The Ring of Troth, founded in 1987 by Edred Thorsson, also known as Stephen Flowers, and James Chisholm. Its early history has baggage, as nearly all modern Pagan institutions do. There were occult influences, personality conflicts, internal controversies, and leadership struggles. No serious reading of modern Heathen history should pretend otherwise.

But The Troth also became known as one of the major non-racialist, inclusive Heathen organizations. That distinction is important. It was not built as a folkish gatekeeping body. It was built around education, publication, community, religious training, and the idea that Heathenry could be practiced without racial exclusion.

The Troth currently describes its mission as building and supporting a diverse, inclusive spiritual community that provides education, clergy training, pastoral care, and publications for the many faiths within Heathenry. Its current values are listed as Integrity, Hospitality, Courage, Reverence, and Sustainability.

Those values are worth looking at carefully.

The Troth defines courage as anti-racism, active resistance to white supremacy, and confronting injustice and bigotry. That is a long way from the watered-down “honour, courage, loyalty” boilerplate that gets passed around in some Heathen spaces as if it were ancient law carved into a stone somewhere.

It is not.

Modern Heathenry is full of reconstruction, interpretation, invention, recovery, and correction. The honest practitioner needs to admit that. We are not walking out of an untouched Iron Age temple. We are rebuilding from fragments: poems, sagas, archaeology, folklore, comparative religion, devotional experience, and modern community work.

That means the question is not whether an organization is modern.

They all are.

The better question is this: what kind of modern thing is it trying to build?

The Problem Declaration 127 Tried to Answer

To understand why The Troth matters, we have to talk about Declaration 127.

Declaration 127 first appeared in 2016 through Huginn’s Heathen Hof. It was written as a response to escalating folkish rhetoric and, more specifically, to the Ásatrú Folk Assembly, commonly shortened to AFA.

The AFA is a folkish Heathen organization. The Southern Poverty Law Center describes it as a neo-Völkisch hate group and states that its members subscribe to the belief that pre-Christian Norse and Germanic religions can only properly be practiced by people with Northern European ancestral roots, especially white people.

That is the core problem.

Folkism tries to turn ancestry into spiritual ownership. It takes the honouring of ancestors, which can be meaningful and sacred, and twists it into a locked gate. It says, in effect, that blood decides belonging.

Declaration 127 said no.

The name comes from Hávamál stanza 127, often rendered in English along these lines:

“When you see misdeeds, speak out against them, and give your enemies no frið.”

That line is the spine of the matter.

Frith is often discussed as peace, safety, social harmony, sacred order, and the bonds that hold a community together. But Declaration 127 forces a harder question: is frith owed to those who are actively poisoning the well?

That is not a small question.

Modern Pagan spaces often love the language of tolerance. Everyone gets a seat. Everyone gets a voice. Everyone gets to speak their truth. That sounds noble right up until someone uses that openness to normalize exclusion, bigotry, and racial gatekeeping.

At that point, unlimited tolerance becomes cowardice dressed as hospitality.

Declaration 127 was important because it said, publicly and collectively, that Heathen groups should not maintain silence simply to keep peace with those who use the gods, ancestors, and traditions to justify prejudice.

The Original Declaration: A Necessary First Line

The original Declaration 127 was powerful because it gave inclusive Heathens a shared public statement. It allowed kindreds, groups, and organizations to say: we do not stand with the AFA; we do not accept racial exclusion as Heathenry; we do not grant folkism the cover of religious diversity.

That may sound obvious now, but at the time it was not always treated as obvious.

According to The Troth’s own later summary, before Declaration 127 there had been a habit in some Heathen spaces of tolerating white nationalists and folkish actors as if their presence were simply an unpleasant cost of growing the religion. The hope seemed to be that if inclusive Heathens offered enough hospitality, the folkish element might eventually soften.

That did not happen.

Because folkism does not enter the hall looking for hospitality. It enters looking for legitimacy.

That is the real lesson.

If a group built on exclusion is allowed to sit beside everyone else as merely “another kind of Heathenry,” then the wider public sees two equal options: inclusive Heathenry and racialized Heathenry. That is exactly the trap. It makes white supremacy look like a valid theological position instead of a corruption of the sacred.

The original Declaration 127 disrupted that.

It was not perfect. It was not complete. It was not a magic spell. But it gave people language. It gave people a public marker. It gave people a way to say, “No, that does not represent us.”

Sometimes the first act of rebuilding a community is not writing a complete constitution.

Sometimes it is simply pointing at the fire and saying, “That does not belong in the hall.”

The Criticism: Did Declaration 127 Go Far Enough?

Declaration 127 also drew criticism from inclusive Heathens who supported its general purpose but believed it did not go far enough.

A 2019 article in The Wild Hunt summarized one of the key concerns: because the original Declaration focused heavily on the AFA, some felt it weakened the broader statement that needed to be made. The real issue was not only one organization. The issue was folkism, racial exclusion, and opposition to inclusivity across Heathen spaces.

That criticism is fair.

There is a danger in making one group the entire target. If one organization is named as the problem, then others can dodge the issue by saying, “We are not them.” But the rot can exist under different names, different logos, and different tones of voice.

A person does not have to wear an AFA patch to carry folkish ideas.

A kindred does not have to use open slurs to create an exclusionary space.

A group does not have to shout “white supremacy” to quietly build its membership around blood, ancestry, ethnicity, gender conformity, and suspicion of outsiders.

That is why Declaration 127 had to evolve.

Declaration 127 2.0 and Declaration of Deeds

By 2021, Declaration 127 2.0 had emerged as a broader non-discrimination statement. The Troth explains the difference this way: the original Declaration gave people something to stand against, while Declaration 127 2.0 set a broader standard of conduct for people and organizations to follow.

That distinction matters.

Standing against something is necessary. But eventually, a community has to say what it stands for.

“We are not folkish” is a beginning.

It is not the whole path.

Around the same period, another statement called the Declaration of Deeds was also written and circulated. It framed the matter through a simple but deeply Heathen idea: we are our deeds. We are not made worthy or unworthy by the circumstances of birth. We are judged by what we do.

That may be one of the cleanest anti-folkish arguments available.

Folkism says blood matters most.

Declaration of Deeds says deeds matter most.

That is a direct collision of worldviews.

The Troth signed both Declaration 127 2.0 and the Declaration of Deeds in 2022. In its announcement, The Troth stated that simply saying “we will not associate with white nationalists” was not enough, because Heathens also had to declare what they were for.

That is the mature stage of the argument.

Not just “no frith with folkism,” but also: what kind of frith are we building instead?

The Collapse and Stewardship of Declaration 127

Declaration 127 did not remain stable forever.

According to The Troth’s current Declaration 127 page, after Declaration 127 2.0 was approved and released during the COVID-19 pandemic period, the structure around it began to unravel. By the end of 2021, the committee had burned out and the website had gone down. The statement still existed, but its home, signatory process, and active stewardship had weakened.

That is not surprising.

Volunteer-driven Pagan work burns people out. That is not an insult. It is a reality. People build something important, hold it together with unpaid labour, fight the same fights repeatedly, get attacked from multiple sides, and eventually run out of fuel.

Movements often fail not because the idea was wrong, but because the people carrying it were exhausted.

In April 2024, Rob Schreiwer turned over stewardship and ownership of Declaration 127 and its associated assets to The Troth at Frith Forge. The Troth then became the official steward of Declaration 127, with the stated goal of preserving it, updating it, and forming committees to vet signatories and guide its future.

That is where The Troth becomes more than just another signatory.

It becomes part of the infrastructure carrying Declaration 127 forward.

That does not mean The Troth owns inclusive Heathenry.

It does not mean The Troth speaks for every Heathen.

It does not mean The Troth is beyond criticism.

But it does mean that The Troth has taken formal responsibility for one of the major anti-folkish documents in modern Heathen history.

Did Declaration 127 Defeat Folkism?

No.

And it is important to say that plainly.

Declaration 127 did not destroy folkism. It did not erase white nationalism. It did not stop bad actors from using runes, gods, ancestors, and Germanic symbols for racial politics.

The Troth itself admits this. Its Declaration 127 page notes that folkish Paganism and white nationalism surged during the rise of the far right between 2015 and 2021, and that less than a year after Declaration 127 was written, Charlottesville happened.

That should sober everyone up.

Declarations are not wards.

They are not spells.

They are not substitutes for action.

A declaration is a line written down. Its worth depends on whether anyone is willing to stand on that line when pressure comes.

This is where modern Pagan communities often fail. We write beautiful statements. We share them. We pin them. We put them in bylaws. Then, when conflict arrives, we suddenly rediscover our fear of confrontation.

But Hávamál 127 is not passive.

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, quietly hope things improve.”

It does not say, “When you see misdeeds, maintain neutrality so everyone feels welcome.”

It says to speak out against wrong and give no frith to enemies.

That is a hard teaching.

Hard teachings are usually the ones communities need most.

The Troth as the Inn

The Troth uses a useful image for itself: the inn on the roadside of Heathenry.

I like that image.

Not a throne.

Not a fortress.

Not a blood gate.

An inn.

An inn offers hospitality. An inn has a hearth. An inn gives travellers a place to rest, learn, eat, speak, and continue on their road. Not everyone who comes to the inn stays forever. Some people warm their hands by the fire and move on. Some become regulars. Some become innkeepers.

But an inn also has a door.

That is the part people forget.

Hospitality does not mean surrendering the house to those who would burn it down.

Frith does not mean smiling politely while someone poisons the well.

Inclusivity does not mean including exclusion.

The innkeeper has a duty to guests, yes. But the innkeeper also has a duty to the hearth, the house, and everyone already sheltering inside.

That is why “no frith with folkism” is not a contradiction of hospitality. It is a defence of hospitality.

You cannot build a welcoming hall while giving honoured seats to those who want some of the guests removed by blood, race, sexuality, gender, ancestry, or ability.

At that point, the issue is no longer politeness.

It is protection.

The Nine Noble Virtues Problem

This also matters when we talk about the Nine Noble Virtues.

Many people encounter Heathenry through simplified virtue lists: courage, truth, honour, fidelity, discipline, hospitality, self-reliance, industriousness, perseverance. These are often presented as if they are ancient Heathen doctrine.

They are not.

They are modern constructions.

That does not automatically make every word on the list worthless. Hospitality, courage, truth, and perseverance can all be good things. But the problem is not whether a virtue sounds nice. The problem is who framed it, why they framed it, and what kind of community it trains people to accept.

A virtue list can become a mask.

“Honour” can become obedience.

“Loyalty” can become silence.

“Discipline” can become authoritarianism.

“Folk” can become race.

That is why The Troth’s current values are worth noting. It does not center the Nine Noble Virtues as its defining ethical framework. Instead, it names integrity, hospitality, courage, reverence, and sustainability, and it defines courage in terms of anti-racism and active resistance to white supremacy.

That is not accidental.

That is a corrective.

No Frith with Folkism

The phrase “no frith with folkism” works because it goes straight to the heart of the issue.

Folkism wants the benefits of Heathen language without the obligations of Heathen ethics.

It wants ancestry without humility.

It wants tradition without hospitality.

It wants gods without accountability.

It wants symbols without responsibility.

It wants frith while denying frith to others.

That cannot stand.

Frith is not a decorative word. It is not a warm fuzzy feeling. It is a bond of peace, trust, and right relationship. If someone’s ideology is built on excluding sincere seekers because of race, gender, sexuality, ancestry, or ability, then that person has already broken frith.

Refusing them a seat at the hearth is not the first act of hostility.

It is the recognition that hostility was already brought in with them.

The Useful Lesson of The Troth

The Troth is not perfect.

No institution is.

Its history has conflict. Its founders were human. Its leadership has changed. Its roof has leaked. Its hearth has burned low at times. There are people who will criticize it from inside and outside Heathenry, and some of those criticisms may be worth hearing.

But perfection is not the test.

The better test is this:

When the line had to be drawn, where did the organization stand?

On the question of folkism, racial exclusion, and white supremacy in Heathenry, The Troth has placed itself on the inclusive side of the line. Its current mission, values, Declaration 127 stewardship, and signing of Declaration 127 2.0 and the Declaration of Deeds all point in that direction.

That does not make The Troth the final authority on Heathenry.

It does not make membership mandatory.

It does not mean everyone must agree with its structure, leadership, theology, or institutional choices.

But it does make The Troth a useful landmark.

When someone claims Heathenry must be folkish, The Troth proves otherwise.

When someone claims the gods belong only to bloodlines, Declaration 127 answers otherwise.

When someone claims peace requires tolerating white supremacy, Hávamál 127 answers otherwise.

When someone asks whether there can be frith with folkism, the answer should be plain.

No.

Not at this hearth.

Closing Thought

Modern Heathenry is not ancient Heathenry resurrected whole.

It is a reconstruction. A rebuilding. A difficult act of memory, scholarship, devotion, community, and correction.

That means we have choices to make.

We can rebuild the hall as a blood gate.

Or we can rebuild it as a hearth.

We can use ancestry as a weapon.

Or we can honour ancestors without turning them into border guards.

We can mistake silence for peace.

Or we can remember that sometimes peace is protected by speaking plainly against what would destroy it.

The Troth, at its best, is the inn on the roadside.

Declaration 127 is the sign by the door.

The fire is lit.

But folkism does not get a seat by the hearth.


Sources and Further Reading